Bergoglio promotes “non-sacramental marriages” with idolaters of false religions who are not baptized

 Bergoglio violates the precepts of the Church that obliges all Catholics —To obey the laws of the Church concerning marriage.

‟Many marriages are not good; they do not please Our Lord and are not of God." — Our Lady of Fatima.

Frank Walker: Vicar of Sin celebrates couple who didn't 'feel welcome' in the Church since they lived together for years and had three kids

Bergoglio also maliciously promoted “non-sacramental marriages” with idolaters of false religions who are not baptized.

Bergoglio praised the “non-sacramental marriages” of Ambassador Luca Attanasio with the Muslim Zakia Seddiki.

Raad Salam Naaman: Allah is not the same God of the Gospel

Bergoglio deceives Muslims because in order to be saved they need to renounce their false religion, convert to Catholicism and be baptized.

Daniel 7:25 He shall speak words against the Most High...He will intend to change religious festivals and laws.

2 Corinthians 6:14

Warning Against Idolatry

Bear not the yoke with unbelievers. For what participation hath justice with injustice? Or what fellowship hath light with darkness?

Canonists explains that these interreligious marriages with Muslims and Buddhists are not sacramental. Because a sacrament cannot be conferred on someone who is not baptized.

"The act of marrying a non-believer actually represents an impediment to the validity of the marriage."

These Forbidden Marriages are now permitted despite the fact that the juggling canonists themselves clarify that although these marriages are legal because they have the 'bishop's dispensation' they are not sacramental marriages. “It is referred to as a non-sacramental marriage.” As if a bishop could give permission to live in sin by fornicating with an idolatrous member of a false religion. Or that they could legalize a civil marriage. Or rather as if they had the divine power to override Divine Natural Law.

“It is referred to as a non-sacramental marriage.”

Can. 1086 §1. A marriage between two persons, one of whom was baptized in the Catholic Church or received into it, and the other of whom is not baptized, is invalid.

 

Catechism of St. Pius X  

6 Q. Among Christians, then, there can be no true marriage that is not a sacrament?

A. Among Christians there can be no true marriage that is not a sacrament. 

 

7 Q. What effects does the sacrament of Matrimony produce?

A. The sacrament of matrimony: (1) Gives an increase of sanctifying grace; (2) Gives a special grace for the faithful discharge of all the duties of the married state. 

 

15 Q. What is necessary to contract marriage lawfully?

A. To contract marriage lawfully it is necessary to be free from every impeding impediment to marriage; to be instructed in the principal truths of religion; and, finally, to be in a state of grace; otherwise a sacrilege would be committed. 

 

16 Q. What are impediments to marriage?

A. Impediments to marriage are certain circumstances which render marriage either invalid or unlawful. The former are called diriment impediments and the latter impeding impediments.

17 Q. Give examples of diriment impediments.

A. Diriment impediments are, for example, relationship to the fourth degree, spiritual relationship, a solemn vow of chastity, or difference in religion, that is, when one party is baptised and the other is not.

 

24 Q. Is it sufficient for a Christian to get only the civil marriage or contract?

A. For a Christian, it is not sufficient to get only the civil contract, because it is not a sacrament, and therefore not a true marriage.

 

25 Q. In what condition would the spouses be who would live together united only by a civil marriage?

A. Spouses who would live together united by only a civil marriage would be in an habitual state of mortal sin, and their union would always be illegitimate in the sight of God and of the Church.

Cardinal Pell: “Communion for the divorced and remarried....” – it’s only the tip of the iceberg, it’s a Trojan horse. They want wider changes, recognition of civil unions, recognition of homosexual unions,” he said.

Let's not forget that here we are talking about the apostate Jorge Mario Bergoglio, that infidel who from Argentina had betrayed the faith to support the civil unions of homosexual couples. And that he publicly recognized the sinful union of a lesbian couple as "marriage."

Bergoglio believes he has the power to abolish God's law that prohibits homosexual unions.

Using the very words of Bishop Schneider we see that Bergoglio has usurped the Divine Power that belongs exclusively to God:  "Admitting couples living in “irregular unions” to Holy Communion and allowing them to practice acts that are reserved for spouses in a valid marriage would be tantamount to the usurpation of a power that does not belong to any human authority, because to do so would be a pretension to correct the Word of God himself. "

It is notorious that Bergoglio acts as a criminal mastermind who knows where the explosives his group secretly planted are hidden and then detonates them one by one. The same modernists who influenced the documents of Vatican II declared that they cunningly introduced ambiguous ideas (heresies) and that at the right moment they would know how to interpret them.

    Father Eduard Schillebeeckx (1914-2009)

    Vatican II theologian

He did not hide the intention with the documents of the Vatican II Council: "We used ambiguous terms during the Council, and we know how we will interpret them later."

That is why we see Bergoglio obsessed with creating a parasitic sect in the name of the heretical and schismatic interpretation of Vatican II.

Just as it is impossible to pretend to introduce a triangle in a circle, we see the deceitful tricks that current canonists have had to come up with to try to explain the impossible. And that directly contradict the Previous Laws of the Churches. Following the introduction of these heretical falsehoods, it has come to the fabrication of a pseudo sacrament, an imitation of a sacrament, called "non-sacramental marriages". We see how after the New Canon Law was cunningly adulterated, it passed to the imitation of a sacrament that is invalid and sacrilegious.