The 46 stars on the Virgin of Guadalupe's mantle prove that Bergoglio and Prevost are not legitimate Popes

 These 46 stars on the tilma represent the 46 popes since the apparition of Our Lady of Guadalupe in 1531.  They also correlate with the prophecies of Garabandal, which indicate that the End Times began after Benedict XVI.

Neither Bergoglio nor Prevost appear on the Virgin of Guadalupe's mantle.

The image of the Virgin in the Book of Revelation

Therefore, the tilma brings us the message that Our Lady of Guadalupe is the apocalyptic revelation of the Bible.

On the cloak that covers the Blessed Virgin Mary, which is blue and has 46 stars, these 46 stars are arranged in the exact same way as they appeared in the sky on the night of December 12, 1531, the night the apparition occurred.

Obviously, there are many more stars in the night sky, hundreds of them, but only these 46 are represented on the cloak.

It has been said, for example, that the Corona Borealis constellation on the Virgin's forehead is a message about the royalty of the Blessed Virgin Mary, Queen of Heaven and Earth.

The constellation of Virgo, represented over the Virgin's heart, has been seen as confirmation that the figure depicted is the Blessed Virgin Mary. And the constellation of Leo on Mary's abdomen serves as a reminder that the image on the cloak represents a woman carrying the King of the Universe.

The researcher Alessandro Masano has recently made a discovery that more clearly reveals the apocalyptic message of the tilma. In 1531, when the apparition occurred, the reigning Pope was Clement VII, who died in 1534. And from him to Benedict XVI, there are exactly 46 Popes, the same number as the stars on the tilma.

The stars are grouped into constellations in the sky, each containing hundreds of stars. But on the tilma, only a few stars from each of the 14 constellations are shown because each star in the constellation corresponds to a name adopted by a Pope.

For example, there are nine stars in the "Ursa Major" constellation depicted on the tilma, and there have been nine popes named Pius since 1531. There are seven stars in Scorpio, and there have been seven popes named Clement. There are five stars in Centaurus, and there have been five popes named Innocent.

There are also constellations with only one star, and it so happens that there are also four popes with unique names: Julius, John, Sixtus, and Marcellus.

Therefore, the apparition of Our Lady of Guadalupe is a revelation for the End Times, with all that this implies.

The Virgin Mary led the indigenous people out of paganism, but Prevost, like the reprobate Jorge Bergoglio, confirms them in paganism.

Indigenous priest who receives Bergoglio's support relies on the Amazonian's Instrumentum Laboris to violate the First Commandment and commit apostasy

Hierarchy apostate in Peru want to 'canonize' the Marxist priest Luigi Bolla, who refused to preach to the Indians the true faith. Closing to them the only door of salvation.

The ecumenical heresy promoted by Bergoglio and Prevost is an attack against the teachings of Our Lady of Guadalupe

Scalfari: Francis' Goal Is One World Religion

Our Lady of Guadalupe destroys the Ecumenical Masonic heresy of religious indifferentism promoted by Bergoglio

No Greater Enemy of Our Lady Than Modern Ecumenism: Priest and Martyr Maximilian Kolbe

That was written by the martyr in 1933.

Maximilian said, “There is no greater enemy of the Immaculata and her Knighthood than today’s ecumenism, which every Knight must not only fight against, but also neutralize through diametrically opposed action and ultimately destroy.” (Entry of Diary dated April 23, 1933. Cited from The Immaculata Our Ideal, Father Karl Stehlin [Warsaw: Te Deum, 2005], p.37. – [4] Entry of Diary dated April 23, 1933. Cited from The Immaculata Our Ideal, Father Karl Stehlin [Warsaw: Te Deum, 2005], p.37)

                                

“God has never made or formed but one enmity; but it is an irreconcilable one, which shall endure and develop even to the end. It is between Mary, His worthy Mother, and the devil,—between the children and the servants of the Blessed Virgin and the children and instruments of Lucifer. The most terrible of all the enemies which God has set up against the devil is His holy Mother, Mary. He has inspired her, even since the days of the earthly Paradise, though she existed then only in His idea, with so much hatred against that cursed enemy of God, with so much industry in unveiling the malice of that old serpent, with so much power to conquer, to overthrow, and to crush that proud impious rebel, that he fears her not only more than all Angels and men, but in some sense more than God Himself. It is not that the anger, the hatred, and the power of God are not infinitely greater than those of the Blessed Virgin, for the perfections of Mary are limited, but it is, first, because Satan, being proud, suffers infinitely more from being beaten and punished by a little and humble handmaid of God, and her humility humbles him more than the Divine power; and, secondly, because God has given Mary such a great power against the devils, that, as they have often been obliged to confess, in spite of themselves, by the mouths of the possessed, they fear one of her sighs for a soul more than the prayers of all the Saints, and one of her menaces against them more than all other torments.”

― St. Louis de Montfort, True Devotion to Mary: With Preparation for Total Consecration

Cardinal Burke: Catholics have Our Lady of Guadalupe as mother, ‘not Pachamama’

New evidence of the heretical deviations of the apostate homosexual Tucho Fernández

 

Tucho's pornographic writings demonstrate that in Argentina he openly defied divine Natural Law and contradicted Catholic morality.

Bull of Pope Paul IV Against Heretics: "Cum Ex Apostolatus Officio"

The Magisterium of the Church has decreed in perpetuity that the elevation of a heretic to any hierarchical office is invalid and null. On the same day that Bergoglio invalidly elevated the homosexual Tucho and Cobo as "cardinals," he also elevated Prevost, with the intention that these homosexual activists would solidify their rebellion against God and against the Church.

Apostate Cobo is an active homosexual

Argentine priest Rodrigo Vázquez: Tucho and García Cuerva are left-wing anti-Catholic homosexuals

Prevost and Tucho are enemies of the Kingdom of Christ. And those who oppose Christ are called antichrists. To join Prevost and Tucho is to join the antichrist. And it is to abandon the Church to become part of the Anti-Church.

By not revoking Fiducia Supplicans and Amoris Laetitia, Tucho and Prevost continue to attack the Sacrament of Marriage, and with this they demonstrate the element of obstinacy in their heresy and apostasy

Tucho Imagines An Underage Girl Having an Affair with "Jesus" – 

Apostate Fernández's blasphemous porn pamphlet normalizes homosexual relationships

Archbishop Fernández previously argued in favor of condom use, contradicting Catholic doctrine - LifeSite

"Tucho"  Fernández : "More than a friend, I am Bergoglio's son. His words have marked me for the rest of my life"

Cardinal Müller Confirms Vatican Doctrinal Office Had File Warning About Archbishop Fernández| National Catholic Register

 Mariologists Rebuke Tucho's anti-Marian document, calling it erroneous and unfortunate

                                "Authority" of a Pornographer

ElWanderer points out that in Argentina, Tucho was already obsessed with criticizing the Co-Redemptrix. “What moral authority or theological discernment can a pornographer possibly possess? What About Leo XIV: Manipulator? Hypocrite? Limited Man?”

Gay blessings 'will remain' under Pope Leo, Vatican doctrine chief says | National Catholic Reporter

Bishop accountability group voices concerns about Archbishop Fernández appointment

Bishop Accountability. Org Says Víctor Fernández with troubling record on covering up homosexual abuse  “should have been investigated, not promoted to one of the highest posts in the global church.”

Víctor "Tucho" Fernández: "They even told me that I did not support the Church's vision of homosexuals"

Tucho: When I told him no, at first, he told me "I want to reconfigure it, think about it carefully."

Mariologists Rebuke Tucho's anti-Marian document, calling it erroneous and unfortunate

 

Gloria TV News

In a 23-page response, the International Marian Association Theological Commission (IMA) highlights what it sees as significant errors and omissions in Cardinal Tucho Fernández’s doctrinal note Mater Populi Fidelis. Key phrases:

- If the title Co-redemptrix is always inappropriate or inopportune to use, then the popes, saints and mystics who approved or used the title were acting in an inappropriate and imprudent manner.

- Members of the IMA Theological Commission who have taught Mariology for decades certainly do not find the title Co-redemptrix ‘unhelpful’.

- While it is appropriate that Mater Populi Fidelis acknowledges papal uses of the title Co-redemptrix, it is unfortunate that these papal uses are not given greater respect or presence in the actual text.

- It is unusual that a doctrinal note of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith would quote at length a secular interview by a cardinal prefect, and at the same time, not include over ten papal usages of the same title.

- It is also unusual that Mater Populi Fidelis essentially omits Lumen Gentium n. 58, which is arguably the most co-redemptive passage of Vatican II concerning Mary.

- It is inaccurate for the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith to say that ‘Some popes have used the title “Co-redemptrix” without elaborating much on its meaning’. Pius XI and John Paul II explain Mary’s role as Co-redemptrix quite clearly, and they do so in terms that the Dicastery describes as ‘immediate, Christo-typical or maximalist cooperation’.

- One of the prominent doctrinal omissions in Mater Populi Fidelis is that, while it speaks of Mary’s unique active role in the Redemption, it never states that Mary’s unique active role is redemptive.

- The text seeks to reduce Mary’s maternal mediation only to intercession.

- Such an assessment, however, fails to take into account the consistent papal teachings on Mary’s universal mediation of grace going back to the 18th century and up to and including the pontificate of Pope Francis.

- Mater Populi Fidelis speaks in general of the spiritual motherhood of Mary, but it reduces it to a type of intercession that only encourages us ‘to open our hearts to Christ’s activity in the Holy Spirit’. What is missing is a true presentation of Mary’s authentic spiritual motherhood, which includes her maternal role in the spiritual conception, generation, birth and nourishment of souls.

- It is unfortunate that the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith would choose to omit repeated teachings and references of twelve popes over four centuries of what constitute numerous higher-level expressions of ordinary Papal Magisterium concerning the Catholic doctrinal teaching of Mary as the Mediatrix of all graces.

- What new insights have emerged in the few years since these great post-conciliar saints, as well as St. John Paul II, that make a title used by these popes, saints, and mystics to be described now as ‘always inappropriate?’ This, rather, appears to be an anti-development of doctrine.

- The emphasis on Christ’s merit is used against the legitimacy of the true human merit of Mary.

- Minimizing Mary’s merits also undermines all human merit and cooperation in the work of Redemption.

- Mater Populi Fidelis repeatedly speaks of the ‘risks’ of using the Co-redemptrix title… It likewise warns of the dangers in seeing Mary as the Mediatrix of all graces… However, it is precisely these teachings that constitute the perpetual doctrine of the Church—from their seed form in Scripture, to the Patristic model of Mary as the New Eve, up to modern and contemporary popes.

- The ‘risks’ posited appear more theoretical than real. It would be difficult to find within the Church a single reputable Catholic author in the last three centuries who taught that the Co-redemptrix title denotes that Mary is divine or an equal redeemer parallel to Jesus.

- To propose, instead, a Redemption based on ‘Jesus alone’ bereft of any human redemptive value on the part of Mary, seems to resemble more a Protestant theology of Redemption than that of the Catholic Church.

For the record:

Faithful Worldwide Petition Pope Leo XIV to Re-examine “Mater Populi Fidelis”

Why Liberalism and Socialism Hate the Dogma of the Immaculate Conception so Much

 

By TFP LA

“Why Liberalism and Socialism Hate the Dogma of the Immaculate Conception so Much.” was the topic of the latest Ladies Talk and Tea. It was held in Lafayette, the heart of Acadiana.

A short answer is to be found in the affirmation that of all creatures, only Mary (and naturally her Divine Son Jesus) was conceived without the stain of original sin. This makes her unequal to the rest of the human race. It places her in a unique, privileged place in God’s Creation and Divine Plan. For the liberal who believes that the individual is without the effects of original sin, or the socialist who believes the masses are, this anti-egalitarian act of God inspires not admiration but hatred. And this applies to Catholics influenced either by the liberalism of the French Revolution or the socialism of the Russian Revolution.

Our country was consecrated to Our Lady of the Immaculate Conception on May 13, 1846. That was years before Blessed Pius IX proclaimed the dogma as a truth of the Universal Church. In 1584 there was a chapel dedicated to the Immaculate Conception in St. Augustine, Florida. Fr. Marquette, the French Jesuit, in 1673 named the Mississippi the River of the Immaculate Conception. And then we cannot forget that in Lourdes, to the chagrin of liberal Catholics of the time, Our Lady described herself as “The Immaculate Conception.”

Alone, of all the Children of Adam, Mary was conceived Immaculate

Francis Denying Immaculate Conception: “Mary Not Born A Saint”

Bergoglio: "And you will tell me: of course! They are Our Lady and Saint Joseph! Yes, but let us not think it was easy for them: saints are not born, they become thus, and this is true for them too".

Salvini Remembers the Immaculate Conception, and the Italian Bishops Attack Salvini 

Bergoglio does not believe in the dogma of the Immaculate Conception of Mary

Bergoglio Suggests Mary Did Not Intend to Be ‘Ever Virgin’

Mary surely she wanted to say to the Angel: ‘Liar! I was deceived.’

Devotion to Our Lady of the Mystical Rose emphasizes Mary's role as mediatrix of all graces

 

 Hour of Grace December 8, 12 noon to 1 PM

O Rosa Mystica, who with maternal love, cooperated with the mystery of the Incarnation of the Eternal Word, and, by your powerful intercession, grant us the grace of true faith, hope, and charity, and the gift of perseverance in a holy life, that we may one day be united with you and your Divine Son in Heaven. Amen.

Our Lady of the Mystical Rose:

First Apparition of the Virgin with the Swords:

- The first sword: The unworthy celebration of Holy Mass and unworthy reception of Holy Communion.

- The second sword: Those who are unfaithful or abandon their priestly or religious vocation.

- The third sword: Betrayal of the faith.

Our Lady of the Mystical Rose:

Then, with a face full of sadness, the Virgin said: “At this time, the Christians of your Italian nation are the ones who offend Our Lord, my Divine Son, the most, with sins against holy purity.