Monday, March 13, 2017

Bergoglio desecrated the Basilica of St. Peter.

Bergoglio is complicit with the heretical Anglicans desecrated the Basilica of St. Peter’s by hosting an Anglican liturgy in the Basilica. He has risen above the Magisterium and disobeys it openly, acting according to his own will as if the Church were his property and not Jesus Christ.  He does not obey God but does his own will. Bergoglio rebels against God just as King Saul disobeyed God. Bergoglio destroys the Holy Mass, replacing it with these ecumenical rituals   which promotes the heresy of religious indifferentism. 

Bergoglio 26 February 2017: But to send them to see, to learn from the young Churches would be a great richness in the sense you said. Ecumenism is easier there, it’s easier, something that does not mean <it’s> more superficial, no, no, it’s not superficial. They don’t negotiate the faith and <their> identity. In the north of Argentina, an aborigine says to you: “I’m Anglican.” But the bishop is not here, the Pastor is not here, the Reverend is not here . . .  “I want to praise God on Sunday and so I go to the Catholic Cathedral,” and vice versa. They are riches of the young Churches. I don’t know, this is what comes to me to say to you.



 Saint Cyprian of Carthage – Whoever is separated from the Church and is joined with an adulteress is separated from the promises of the Church.
Pope Leo XIII’s 1896 , Apostolicae Curae: Anglican orders are “absolutely null and utterly void”


Pope Leo XIII

  • It breaks away from the Apostolic succession

In the rite of conferring and administering any sacrament one rightly distinguishes between the ceremonial part and the essential part, which is customarily called the matter and form. […] Now, the words which until recent times were everywhere held by the Anglicans as the proper form of priestly ordination, namely, ‘Receive the Holy Spirit,’ certainly do not in the least signify definitely the order of priesthood, or its grace and power, which is especially the power ‘of consecrating and of offering the true Body and Blood of the Lord,’ in that sacrifice which is no ‘nude commemoration of the sacrifice offered on the Cross’ [see n. 950]. Such a form was indeed afterwards lengthened by these words, ‘for the office and work of a priest’; but this rather convinces one that the Anglicans themselves saw that this first form was defective, and not appropriate to the matter. But the same addition, if perchance indeed it could have placed legitimate significance on the form, was introduced too late, since a century had elapsed after the adoption of the Edwardine Ordinal; since, moreover, with the extinction of the hierarchy, there was now no power for ordaining. (Denzinger-Hünermann 3315-3316. Leo XIII, Letter Apostolicae curae – On the Nullity of Anglican Orders, September 13, 1896)

No comments:

Post a Comment