An audio recording reveals that Roberto Prevost covered up for the pedophile priest "Lute" in a child abuse case in Peru.

 

Prevost Never Suspended Abuser

Covering up for a pedophile priest who abuses Catholic children is not a simple act of negligence, it is a crime and also a grave sin of malice. Prevost not only covered up for the pedophile priest, but he also brazenly lied to and persecuted the priest who defended the victims. Here we can see his complete malice and treachery.

Prevost never suspended Lute from public ministry as a priest.

Prevost, the Diocese of Chiclayo, and journalist Elise Ann Allen lied about Lute's public ministry.

By INFOVATICANA | November 6, 2025

Cardinal Robert Prevost, the Diocese of Chiclayo, and journalist Elise Ann Allen all publicly maintained that Lute had been “suspended from public ministry.” However, the audio recording of Giampero Gambaro, the investigator in the Lute case, proves that this assertion is false: the decree of precautionary measures only removed him from the parish and limited his ability to hear confessions, but did not restrict his public ministry as a priest.

Infovaticana, despite having done a good job in publicly exposing Robert Prevost's cover-up of pedophilia, mistakenly believes that Prevost only has to publicly acknowledge his faults, but in reality, the evidence of this crime shows us that Prevost was disqualified from being legitimately elected pope.

Prevost is an evil man capable of lying to cover up for a pedophile priest who sexually abused Catholic children; this despicable man is a traitor who deserves no trust. Just like the reprobate apostate of infamous memory, Jorge Bergoglio, who rewarded pedophile priests, beginning in his own country, Argentina, where he covered for them and rewarded them, while persecuting faithful priests.

We can demonstrate that Prevost not only covered up for the pedophile priest Lute, but also that the fact that he did not expel Grassi or Zanchetta from the priesthood makes Prevost and Tucho accomplices of these two convicted homosexual predators.

Tucho and Prevost attack traditional Catholic Marian titles, while inventing their own: "Mater Populi Fidelis" and "Solace of Migrants" to fit their ecumenical and apostate Marxist agenda

 

Tucho Fernandez: “When an expression requires many, repeated explanations to prevent it from straying from a correct meaning, it does not serve the faith of the People of God and becomes unhelpful.” Kind of like “synodality” or “Fiducia Supplicans” or Amoris Laetitia?  

If Tucho or Prevost truly believed that Christ is the Redeemer of the World, then why aren't they interested in the salvation of Jews, or of Muslim infidels and other false religions? Why, instead of bowing down to shamans, do neither Bergoglio nor Prevost try to call Jews and infidels to conversion?

We should ask Tucho why he gave his note a Latin title "Mater Populi Fidelis" when his note was not written in Latin.

And when he refers to "Mother of the Faithful People," is he aware that he's stating she isn't his mother because the Virgin Mary was only given by Christ to the faithful Church, not to apostates, heretics, infidels, or those who reject the Messiah, like the Jews?

Dear Catholic brothers, also observe how Prevost maliciously, in his October video, calls -infidels/idolaters who worship their false gods and practice false religions "believers."

These apostates distort the meaning of words; that is why we see that "Traditionis Custodes" actually means "Prisoner of Tradition," not "Guardian of Tradition." And here, "Mater Populi Fidelis," when viewed in the context of apostate ecumenism, acquires the meaning of the Marxist pseudo-theology of people's liberation.

After the Coming of Christ, believers are only the disciples of Jesus Christ.

Unbelievers remain children of wrath.

Mark 16:16 He that believeth and is baptized, shall be saved: but he that believeth not shall be condemned.

 

Revelation 21:8 But as for the cowardly, the faithless (unbelieving), the depraved, the murderers, the sexually immoral, the sorcerers, the idolaters, and liars of every kind, their place is the fiery lake of burning sulfur, which is the second death -eternal damnation.”

Catechism Saint Pius X
Of the ninth article of the Symbol
6th. Those Outside the Communion of Saints

225. Who are those who do not belong to the communion of Saints? The damned do not belong to the communion of saints in the other life, and in this life, those who are outside the true Church.

226. Who are outside the true Church? Outside the true Church are the infidels, the Jews, the heretics, the apostates, the schismatics and the excommunicated.

Muslims who worship the false god Allah are included among the infidels.

Apostasy from the Faith is defined as “the complete and voluntary abandonment of the Christian religion, whether the apostate embraces another religion such as Paganism, Judaism, Mohammedanism, etc., or merely makes profession of Naturalism, Rationalism, etc.” (Catholic Encyclopedia, s.v. “Apostasy”).

Pope Pius XII decreed in his Encyclical Mystici Corporis Christi, the Doctrine on the Mystical Body of Christ, that heresy and apostasy are serious sins that by their very nature separate man from the Body of the Church.

In the Treatise on True Devotion to the Blessed Virgin, St. Louis de Montfort teaches us that the Virgin Mary will lead us in the fight against Satan, to battle against the army of the Antichrist; formed by heretics, apostates, wicked, idolaters and Mohammedans. Saint Louis adds that in these latter times, the Blessed Virgin will raise up great saints, who will extend the empire of Jesus Christ over “the impious, the idolaters and the Muslims.”

Gregory Baum, architect of Nostra Aetate and a peritus at Council Vatican II, confessed to concealing homosexual sex life