"IT IS A GRAVE OFFENSE NOT TO WORK FOR THE EXTERMINATION OF HERESY WHEN THIS MONSTROUS INFECTION REQUIRES ACTION"
— Council of Vienne ♰♰♰


Thursday, April 2, 2026

Prevost despises Christ Crucified

Prevost shows contempt for the cross of Christ

                



              
 The anti-Church Wants Easter Without Calvary 

 1 Corinthians 1:23-24

But we preach Christ crucified, unto the Jews indeed a stumbling block, and unto the Gentiles foolishness:

But unto them that are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God, and the wisdom of God.

 

1 Corinthians 2:2

For I resolved that, while I was with you, I would know nothing except Jesus Christ—and him crucified.

A Church That Wants Easter Without Calvary 

One of the clearest symbols of the present regime was a piece of metal. When the Vatican introduced Leo XIV’s new ferula in January, the Office for the Liturgical Celebrations explained that it showed Christ “no longer bound by the nails of the Passion,” but in a glorified ascent, a visual union of the Cross and Resurrection. That was the Vatican’s own explanation of the object.



And there is the problem. Christ did not rise from the Cross. He died on the Cross. The tomb was empty on Easter morning precisely because Calvary had already been complete. The nails were not an unfortunate stage to be aesthetically moved past. They were the terrible, glorious instrument of redemption. Pius XII warned in Mediator Dei that one strays from the straight path by ordering a crucifix in which the Redeemer’s body “shows no trace of His cruel sufferings.” That warning lands with force here, because the whole point of the new symbol is to mute the Passion in favor of a post-Calvary triumphalism more palatable to modern taste.

That instinct has been with the postconciliar church for decades. Keep the language of hope. Keep the language of encounter. Keep the language of victory. But soften the thing that made victory possible. A suffering Christ rebukes the world. A dead Christ on the altar confronts sin, expiation, judgment, and the need for sacrifice. A stylized risen figure drifting free of the nails is easier to market. It preserves the glow while taming the scandal. And that is why this ferula matters. It is a visual theology of displacement.

Continue reading at Hiraeth in Exile


Archbishop Fulton Sheen: “The essence of the diabolical is hatred of the Cross of Christ.”

            Bergoglio’s Blasphemies: “The Way of the Cross is the story of God’s failure” God is “Unjust; He Sent His Son to a Cross!”
    


 In 1947, Pope Pius XII condemned crucifixes depicting the Risen Christ (known as "Resurrexifixes")—crosses that do not show the sufferings of Christ.


Marie-Julie Jahenny  at a dialogue between Our Lord and Lucifer recounted that the latter said:

“I will attack the Church. I will overthrow the Cross, I will decimate the people, I will deposit a great weakness of Faith in hearts. There will also be a great denial of religion. For a time I will be master of all things, everything will be under my control; even your temple and all your people.”






In 1921, Pope Benedict XV condemned twisted crucifixes.


Among those who hate the Cross of Christ are: Satanists, Masons, apostates, communists, Muslims, Jehovah's Witnesses, atheists, etc.


    

This sect of apostate Peruvian Marxist Augustinians, to which Prevost belongs, hates the Cross of Christ.


Those whom they place upon the cross are the indigenous pagans and Pachamama.



AOLA's Bulletin



1 Corinthians 1:18

Douay-Rheims 1899 American Edition
 For the word of the cross, to them indeed that perish, is foolishness; but to them that are saved, that is, to us, it is the power of God.

Wednesday, April 1, 2026

Apostate Prevost honor Pro-Gay, Pro-Abortion Anglican Heretic Sarah Mullally

           

Prevost mocks the priesthood instituted by Christ.

 

Apostate Robert Prevost: “To The Most Reverend and Right Honourable Dame Sarah Mullally Archbishop of Canterbury”
Pope Leo XIII’s 1896, Apostolicae Curae: Anglican orders are “absolutely null and utterly void”

Professio fidei: “Whoever denies these truths would be in a position of rejecting a truth of Catholic doctrine and would therefore no longer be in full communion with the Catholic Church”



Revelation 22:15 Outside are the dogs (male prostitutes and unfaithful leaders), those who practice magic arts, the sexually immoral, the murderers, the idolaters and everyone who loves and practices falsehood. 
Prevost to heretics: ‘We are already one!’

 Saint Cyprian of Carthage – Whoever is separated from the Church and is joined with an adulteress is separated from the promises of the Church.

 

Malachi 2:2 I will send a curse on you,
    and I will turn your blessings into a curse.


 LifeSiteNews:

Leo XIV issued a congratulatory letter to Sarah Mullally – the first woman ever appointed “archbishop of Canterbury” and a vocal supporter of abortion and the LGBT agenda. In the letter, Leo praises Mullally’s “weighty” responsibilities, and explicitly invokes the Blessed Virgin Mary as a source of “inspiration” for her new role.



The March 20, 2026 message, published on the Vatican website, was released after Mullally’s installation yesterday. It makes no reference whatsoever to the Catholic Church’s perennial teaching that Anglican orders are “absolutely null and utterly void” (Apostolicae Curae, 1896), that the ordination of women is impossible and contrary to the will of Christ, or to Mullally’s own public record promoting grave moral evils of abortion and homosexual acts.

Continue reading at LifeSiteNews

Prevost is not in full communion with the Catholic Church.

CONGREGATION FOR THE DOCTRINE OF THE FAITH
                               'Professio fidei'

Pope Pius IX

One cannot tolerate that faithful or clergy pray for Christian unity under the leadership of heretics, according to an intention infected with heresy

For, it is wholly in this: that it supposes the true Church of Jesus Christ to be composed partly of the Roman Church scattered and propagated throughout the whole world, partly, indeed, of the schism of Photius, and of the Anglican heresy, to which, as well as to the Roman Church, ‘there is one Lord, one faith, and one baptism’(cf. Eph 4:5). Surely nothing should be preferable to a Catholic man than that schisms and dissensions among Christians be torn out by the roots and that all Christians be ‘careful to keep the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace’ (Eph 4:3) But, that the faithful of Christ and the clergy should pray for Christian unity under the leadership of heretics, and, what is worse, according to an intention, polluted and infected as much as possible with heresy, can in no way be tolerated. (Denzinger-Hünermann 2886–2887. Pius IX. Letter of the Holy Office to the Bishops of England, September 16, 1864)


Pius XI

Dealings with those who profess a mutilated version of Christ teachings forbidden

Everyone knows that John himself, the Apostle of love, who seems to reveal in his Gospel the secrets of the Sacred Heart of Jesus, and who never ceased to impress on the memories of his followers the new commandment ‘Love one another’, altogether forbade any intercourse with those who professed a mutilated and corrupt version of Christ’s teaching: ‘If any man come to you and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into the house nor say to him: God speed you’ (2Jn 10). (Pius XI. Encyclical Mortalium animos, no. 9, January 6, 1928)

Pius IX

The necessity to anathemize those who alter the Gospel of Christ, spreading false doctrines and betraying the depository of the faith

Ever since the origins of the early Church, due to the necessity that the faith of the elect be proven like gold in the fire, the Apostle, vessel of election, wished to warn the faithful that if someone arise, of those who alter and amend the Gospel of Christ, spreading false doctrines and betraying the depository of the faith, even if it was an angel who evangelized something other than he had, it would be necessary to anathemize him. (Pius IX. Apostolic letter Ad apostolicae sedis, August 22, 1851)



Pope Leo XII

It is impossible for the most true God to approve all sects who profess false and contradictory teachings

It is impossible for the most true God, who is Truth Itself, the best, the wisest Provider, and the Rewarder of good men, to approve all sects who profess false teachings which are often inconsistent with one another and contradictory, and to confer eternal rewards on their members. […] By it we are taught, and by divine faith we hold one Lord, one faith, one baptism […] This is why we profess that there is no salvation outside the Church. (Leo XII. Encyclical Ubi primum, no. 14 May 5, 1824)

 

Pius XI

The heretics do not possess the true Church nor the faith

In his Controversies, [Saint Francis de Sales], although the holy Doctor made large use of the polemical literature of the past, he exhibits nevertheless a controversial method quite peculiarly his own. In the first place, he proves that no authority can be said to exist in the Church of Christ unless it had been bestowed on her by an authoritative mandate, which mandate the ministers of heretical beliefs in no way can be said to possess. After having pointed out the errors of these latter concerning the nature of the Church, he outlines the notes of the true Church and proves that they are not to be found in the reformed churches, but in the Catholic Church alone. He also explains in a sound manner the Rule of Faith and demonstrates that it is broken by heretics, while on the other hand it is kept in its entirety by Catholics. (Pius XI. Encyclical Rerum omium pertubationem, no. 24, January 26, 1923)


The unbelief of heretics, who confess their belief in the Gospel and resist that faith by corrupting it, is a more grievous sin than that of the Jews and the pagans who have never accepted the Gospel faith

It is written (2Pet 2:21): ‘It had been better for them not to have known the way of justice, than after they have known it, to turn back.’ Now the heathens have not known the way of justice, whereas heretics and Jews have abandoned it after knowing it in some way. Therefore theirs is the graver sin. As stated above (a. 5), two things may be considered in unbelief. One of these is its relation to faith: and from this point of view, he who resists the faith after accepting it, sins more grievously against faith, than he who resists it without having accepted it, even as he who fails to fulfil what he has promised, sins more grievously than if he had never promised it. In this way the unbelief of heretics, who confess their belief in the Gospel, and resist that faith by corrupting it, is a more grievous sin than that of the Jews, who have never accepted the Gospel faith. Since, however, they accepted the figure of that faith in the Old Law, which they corrupt by their false interpretations, their unbelief is a more grievous sin than that of the heathens, because the latter have not accepted the Gospel faith in any way at all.   The second thing to be considered in unbelief is the corruption of matters of faith. In this respect, since heathens err on more points than Jews, and these in more points than heretics, the unbelief of heathens is more grievous than the unbelief of the Jews, and that of the Jews than that of the heretics, except in such cases as that of the Manichees, who, in matters of faith, err even more than heathens do. Of these two gravities the first surpasses the second from the point of view of guilt; since, as stated above (a. 1) unbelief has the character of guilt, from its resisting faith rather than from the mere absence of faith, for the latter as was stated (a. 1) seems rather to bear the character of punishment. Hence, speaking absolutely, the unbelief of heretics is the worst. (Saint Thomas Aquinas. Summa Theologica II–II, q. 10, a.6)

Prevost’s idolatrous sect, ‘AOLA’, implemented Marxist Liberation theology


Pope Pius XI denounced the socialist system as a “threatening danger that seeks to overthrow the Christian social order,” which “rejects the wisdom of the Gospel and resurrects paganism.”

1 Corinthians 6:9-10 Do not be deceived! Fornicators, idolaters, adulterers, male prostitutes, sodomites (...)—none of these will inherit the kingdom of God. 

 


Revelation 22:15 Outside are the dogs 
(male prostitutes and unfaithful leaders), those who practice magic arts, the sexually immoral, the murderers, the idolaters and everyone who loves and practices falsehood. 
Galatians 5:19-21
 The acts of the flesh are obvious: sexual immorality, impurity and debauchery; idolatry and witchcraft; (..), orgies, and the like. I warn you, as I did before, that those who live like this will not inherit the kingdom of God.

The First Commandment of God
Lesson 16 from the Baltimore Cathechism
205How does a Catholic sin against faith? A Catholic sins against faith by apostasy, heresy, indifferentism, and by taking part in non-Catholic worship.

Prevost's AOLA invoked the Mayan gods and promoted the Marxists Leonardo Boff and Gustavo Gutiérrez.
                            

Since its inception, AOLA has pursued a Marxist, anti-Catholic, and indigenist agenda.

The April 1986 Bulletin of the apostate and idolatrous Marxist sect AOLA—to which Robert Prevost belongs, and which promotes indigenous paganism through the “inculturation of the Gospel”—includes a prayer invoking Mayan gods: Tzacol, Bitol, Ixmucane, Ixpiyacoc, Grandmother of the Sun, Grandmother of Light, etc.



Appearing in the newsletter, among others, is the name of Joaquín García—The apostate priest who celebrated the sacrilegious Mass during which, together with Prevost, they worshipped Pachamama.
 Joaquín García Sánchez (from Spain).

St. Augustine of Hippo: Those whom the apostle reproved knew but did not give thanks and, claiming to be wise, actually became fools and fell into idolatry.
Sodomites are idolaters.
 
Saint Thomas Aquinas commenting on Romans 1: 

(Rm 6,23): The wages of sin is death. All their idols will be burned in the fire ((Micah 1,7). And it is noteworthy that the Apostle very reasonably assigns to vices against naturewhich are very serious among carnal sins, the punishment of idolatry (...) 

Sins that violate the First Commandment are superstition, idolatry, witchcraft, sacrilege, atheism, and tempting God.

The First Commandment of God is transgressed:
By opposing religion.
By worshipping idols.
By superstitions.
By invoking spirits.



This apostate sect, which continues to identify itself as Augustinian, has maliciously exploited Saint Augustine to promote its distorted Marxist agenda.





“Recognition of the Value of Indigenous Peoples”




 “The Augustinian community aims at the evangelization of cultures, which entails the inculturation of the Gospel and human promotion.

 Do not attempt to supplant the customs of those peoples with European ones; on the contrary, strive to adapt to them.
 Robert Prevost: “All the things we are hearing today with the talk about synodality, we were already doing in Chulucanas in the 1980s, moving forward, so it was all very natural for me”



The Word of God prohibits the apostate “inculturation of the Gospel,” which violates the First Commandment through the sin of idolatry by promoting indigenous pagan practices.
Since the Old Testament, God has forbidden His people from mingling with pagans and worshipping their gods.

 Joshua 23:6-7
Be most courageous, and be careful to observe everything that is written in the Book of the Law of Moses. Do not turn away from it to the right or the left. Avoid associating with these nations that still remain among you. Do not mention the names of their gods; do not swear by them. Do not serve them; do not worship them.


 


Sins against faith:


Apostasy: This is the complete abandonment of the Christian faith received in baptism; for example, Catholics who change religions or those who, without formally changing religions, have completely distanced themselves from the Catholic faith, falling into rationalism, pantheismMarxism, Freemasony etc.

 



In the August 1986 bulletin of the apostate Marxist sect AOLA, the heretical writings of the Marxists Leonardo Boff and Gustavo Gutiérrez are recommended.

A book by Clodovis Boff from the perspective of liberation.

Furthermore, we have the testimony of the apostate Arthur Purcaro —an active member of this sect—who has stated that they taught the heretical, Marxist Liberation Theology from Chicago.


Arthur Purcaro: Chulucanas Peru from 1971 till 2015




The apostate Marxist Arturo Purcaro teaches the Marxist ideology of Gustavo Gutiérrez at Villanova University.

 
Arthur Purcaro: "
Gutiérrez was a personal friend of mine; I invited him to Chulucanas to accompany us on our journey and to keep alive the "preferential option for the poor"—which, at Puebla, was recognized as a distinct pastoral choice. His thought—beginning with his book *A Theology of Liberation*—came under scrutiny, even in the United States; yet, when I was teaching in Chicago, I offered courses on this theological perspective, and the classroom was always.


"The Earth is crucified; it must be taken down from the Cross, it must be resurrected—and that is the task of an eco-theology of liberation." —Apostate ex-priest Leonardo Boff 


Ecotheology Authors: Juan J. Lydon, OSA – Joaquín García, OSA – Roberto Jaramillo, OSA


 John Lydon, who also appears in the photos worshipping Pachamama in Brazil and Panama.



Juan Lydon, was Secretary General of the Conocoto of OALA
Lydon worked as the Director of the Mother Cabrini Institute on Immigration at Villanova University, where he graduated alongside Prevost in 1977.


REVEALED: The Clergy Who Attended The Pachamama Ritual With Leo XIV

Now living in Chicago, Lydon serves as the head of the Augustinians’ North American house of formation in Hyde Park. He was interviewed by left-wing outlet Focolare Media in February 2026.

“Building communities in the diversity of its members is at the heart of the Augustinian ideal,” he said. “I suspect that this will be an important part of the perspective [Prevost] brings to the papacy, namely, working in a divided world for unity in diversity.”

The National Catholic Reporter previously reported that Lydon lived with Prevost at the Augustinians’ house of formation in Trujillo, Peru from 1990 until 1999. 


Marxist Augustinian Paulo Gabriel López Blanco was one of the members of the Board of Directors of the Conocoto meetings:

 “Leo XIV is a great admirer of Casaldàliga, as was Francis”

 “Leo XIV is a great admirer of Casaldáliga and of Romero, Hélder Câmara, Proaño, or Larraín.






Dissidents National Catholic Register: Prevost's Peru was a Vatican II laboratory of church renewal.






Pope Leo XIII: Socialists distort the Gospel to suit their own purposes
For, indeed, although the socialists, stealing the very Gospel itself with a view to deceive more easily the unwary, have been accustomed to distort it so as to suit their own purposes, nevertheless so great is the difference between their depraved teachings and the most pure doctrine of Christ that none greater could exist: ‘for what participation bath justice with injustice or what fellowship bath light with darkness?’(2 Cor. 6:14) ( Encyclical Quod Apostolici muneris, no. 5, December 28, 1878)

Marxist Robert Prevost: “Inculturation is a difficult but necessary path”

Prevost Sends a Video Message to the 6th General Assembly of CEAMA


Pope Leo XIII condemned communism and socialism, characterizing them as a “pestilential evil that promotes a satanic war against God.”

Marxist Prevost AKA Leo XIV Attributes a Quote from Liberation Theology to St Augustine In his first Apostate Exhortation 'Dilexi Te'





Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith– Formal prohibition to join or favor Communist Parties – latae sententiae excommunication.

Apostasy from the Faith is defined as “the complete and voluntary abandonment of the Christian religion, whether the apostate embraces another religion such as Paganism, Judaism, Mohammedanism, etc., or merely makes profession of Naturalism, Rationalism, etc.” (Catholic Encyclopedias.v. “Apostasy”).



«Also, let us not forget that, as the pontiff himself has said, his theological mentor was Lucio Gera and his “theology of the people”, according to which the people” are not subject to being evangelized but subject to evangelize. It is understood in this way, beyond the undeniable populist eagerness, that Bergoglio's first gesture to look at the fateful Vatican loggia 13/3/13 has been to ask for the blessing of the people. And that also explains why he ordered a survey of the people to know his opinion about the family and other questions of sexual morality. The people teach. »





Warnings against False Teachers
1 Timothy 4:1 Now the Spirit has clearly said that, in the end times, some persons will depart from the faith, paying attention to spirits of error and the doctrines of devils.