Antipope Bergoglio attempts to promulgate formal heresy as official Church teaching

Francis Tries to Sell Heresy As “Authentic Magisterium”

The Acta Apostolicae Sedis, the official gazette of the Holy See, not only published Pope Francis’ approval of a heretic interpretation of Amoris Laetitia but even labels it as “authentic magisterium”.

Francis' private letter is now upgraded to the status of an “Apostolic Letter” and includes a June 2017 rescript by the Secretary of State, Cardinal Pietro Parolin. The rescript declares that both documents, the heretic guidelines of the Buenos Aires bishops and the approving letter of Francis bear the character of “authentic magisterium”. The term “authentic magisterium” is connected in Canon 752 of Church law to a “religious submission of the intellect and will”.

Francis‘ “authentic magisterium“ directly contradicts the “authentic Magisterium” of the Catechism, that states in number 1650 “in fidelity to the words of Jesus Christ”, that the new union of divorced and remarried Catholics “cannot be recognized as valid if the first marriage was”. And, “If the divorced are remarried civilly, they find themselves in a situation that objectively contravenes God’s law.” en.news

non veni pacem

The Splendor of Truth

“This week, the Vatican’s organ for promulgating the Official Acts of the Apostolic See, Acta Apostolicae Sedis (AAS), has published its October 2016 issue, containing Pope Francis’ infamous Letter to the Buenos Aires Bishops. AAS not only published this letter, declaring that there are “no other interpretations” (“No hay otras interpretaciones”) of Amoris Laetitia other than those of the Buenos Aires bishops, but it also published the full Buenos Aires guidelines themselves, which permit Holy Communion in some cases for couples in a state of permanent and public adultery who are not committed to living in complete continence. Most significantly, AAS upgrades Pope Francis’ private letter to the Buenos Aires bishops to the official magisterial status of an “Apostolic Letter” (“Epistola Apostolica”) – AND it includes a special rescript as an addendum by Cardinal Pietro Parolin, Secretary of State. This rescript declares that Pope Francis expressly intends that BOTH documents – the pope’s letter and the Buenos Aires guidelines themselves- bear the character of his “authentic Magisterium”, and that the pope personally ordered their publication in AAS and on the Vatican website.”

Full story at Rorate HERE

And still, there will be a gaggle of apologists queuing up to explain how it’s not “official”, not binding, not magisterial, not what he really meant, mistranslated, etc. Still others will admit that yes, it’s very troubling, but hey, no big deal, no worries, not our place to do anything, best shush up lest the pewsitters be scandalized.
Those are all lies, and the people providing the excuses are liars.
It’s a good thing Antipope Begoglio is not now, was not ever, nor ever shall be pope.  If he were truly pope, this would be the biggest event in the history of the Church since the Ascension, because it would seemingly disprove the Bride of Christ being indefectible, as her Bridegroom promised she would be until the end of time. A rational person with the ability to reason, who thinks Antipope Bergoglio is true pope, MUST LOGICALLY QUESTION HIS OR HER FAITH IN THE ONE HOLY CATHOLIC APOSTOLIC CHURCH, because apparently SHE IS NOT IN FACT WHAT SHE HAS PROCLAIMED HERSELF TO BE FOR 2000 YEARS.
This is not some arcane theological argument. This is a matter of faith and morals where the “visible” Vicar of Christ on earth is directly contradicting Divine Law as spoken directly from the lips of the Creator and Savior of the universe.
Let that sink in.
Yeah, tell me again how the failed partial Benedict abdication is the cuckopants theory and just so far fetched. What an utterly absurd position that is, when the amount of evidence in favor of it continues to grow. Every day that Antipope Bergoglio proves beyond any doubt that he lacks a shred of special papal protection from the Holy Ghost, due to his election being invalid, he strengthens the Benedictine position more and more. For all those still straining to come up with he latest way to square the circle, you’re invited to come have a scotch with me and Occam’s razor.

Bergoglio worships the Muslims in Bangladesh: “The presence of God today is also called 'Rohingya'”

Blasphemy:"The Presence of God Is Called 'Rohingya'" – Meeting Muslim invasor, Bergoglio bow and pleads for "Forgiveness"

Cultural Marxism and apostasy shared by Jesuit dissidents

Bergoglio officially confirms Heresy

en.news The Acta Apostolicae Sedis (2016/10), the official gazette of the Holy See, have published Pope Francis’ private letter through which he confirms the heretical September 2016 interpretation of Amoris Laetitia by the Buenos Aires bishops.

This interpretation which contradicts the Gospel and allows Holy Communion for adulterers, was also published in the Acta Apostolicae Sedis.

The publication of Francis' letter is an attempt to give a patina of officiality to Francis' reckless undermining of Catholic doctrine. 

Bergoglio appointed the apostate Marxist "Cura Villero" Jorge García Cuerva as bishop. The same apostate whom Bergoglio allowed in Argentina to desecrate the sacrament of baptism to support same-sex adoptions and to give sacrilegious communion to a homosexual "couple."

Cardinal Bergolio permitted a homosexual ceremony in a Basilica of Buenos Aires

This is one of those cases to which the heretic Leonardo Boff referred when he said that Bergoglio supported gay adoptions in Argentina: "Pope Francis is more liberal than you think" " Bergoglio approved a gay couple adopting a child".  Boff made the statement the very same week Bergolio was invalidly appointed Pope.

Catapulta

Father Jorge Ignacio García Cuerva was appointed auxiliary bishop of Lomas de Zamora and his curriculum can be consulted in AICA.  

 But the friends of "Sagrada Tradición" report something else: 

"They excluded highlighting in the extensive Curriculum of Fr. Jorge Ignacio García Cuerva very well made up by the  Episcopal Conference of Argentina (CEA) and the Latin American Episcopal Council (CELAM), that on August 25, 2012 he baptized (against the Doctrine of the Catholic Church) the "sons" of a famous transgender who calls himself Florencia Trinidad (1976-), deviated star of the Argentine television in several series of Telefe - Channel 11, of Buenos Aires. 

The real name of tranvestite is Roberto Carlos Trinidad who was born in Resistencia, Province of Chaco.  Roberto began the transition from man to "woman" at age 17.  He began  as "Karen" and then at the suggestion of his boyfriend as "Florencia".  Since then, he underwent sex change surgery while maintaining his male sex organs. 

In 2010 he was legally recognized as a "woman" and changed his legal name to " Florencia De La V ", the first to do so in Argentina.  He married a dentist, his partner since 1998. In 2011, a year later "Florencia" and his husband made arrangements in a California institute for the purchase of an ovule and renting a womb.  That action resulted in the birth of Paul Alexander and Isabella . 

 On the day that Paul Alexander and Isabella turned one year old, the twins were sacraligiously "baptized" against the requirement of Canon Law; at the Basilica of the Blessed Sacrament.  This is one of the most famous basilicas which is located in Buenos Aires, Argentina. 

 Other priests from local churches refused the request of baptism because the "actress" Florencia Trinidad was not baptized as a woman but as a man when his name was Roberto Carlos Trinidad.  They then hired Father Jorge García Cuerva.  At the time he was parish priest of Santa Clara de Asís Church in El Talar, Tigre.  He was also a friend of then Cardinal Bergoglio and of Mons. Vicente Oscar Ojea, who was elected President of the Argentine Episcopal Conference. 

 The agreement with Father Jorge was concluded while "Flor" was staying in Miami where he did not place any impediment to baptize the children.  Also, during the ceremony some claim that the priest gave the gay couple Holy Communion. 

 Father Jorge Ignacio García Cuerva is now appointed Bishop of the Catholic Church ... Even if you do not believe it! "

TRAVESTI ARGENTINO- CARDENAL BERGOGLIO PERMITIO SACRILEGIO BASILICA BUENOS AIRES ARGENTINA

The transvestite sodomite Roberto Trinidad publicly stated that he will train the children with the gender ideology against the moral doctrine of the Catholic Church, as well as the "godfathers" of the sacrilege are also sodomites.

Roberto Trinidad: "Day by day I take care to train them as thinking and unprejudiced people."

Father Jorge Ignacio is part of the so called "curas villeros" who work in poor neighborhoods of Argentina -on the peripheries of Bergoglio- who are in favor of gay pseudo-marriage, gay adoptions, sex-change, commercialization of ovules for the sodomites to fabricated children, surrogate motherhood, promotes pagan cults, and sacrilegious communion for divorced and remarried.

BERGOGLIO´S HERETICAL PAST IS FRANCIS´ PRESENT

BERGOGLIO´S HERETICAL PAST IS FRANCIS´ PRESENT - CATHOLIC TV PROGRAM A COFFEE WITH GALAT-

Francis interview book with Dominique Wolton said that he allows homosexual 'civil union' & to the question: "What is the main sin? his answer was: 'Everything that is below the waist is the least of it, and if a priest asks you why, with whom ?, or how? ... take that priest to a psychologist' " .

Cardinal Bergoglio Supported Same-Sex Civil Unions

Cristina Kirchner, Argentine President, To Be Godmother Of Lesbian Couple's Child

Update Roberto Trinidad promotes abortion in Argentina. 

Bishop: Catholics will be judged by God for failing to ask (Bergoglio) to end confusion

November 27, 2017 (LifeSiteNews) -- One of the world’s most outspoken bishops regarding the current crisis in the Church has said that at the final judgment God will ask Catholics living today who ignored the crisis why they did not ask the Pope to end the confusion in the Church. 

Bishop Athanasius Schneider, auxiliary bishop of Astana in Kazakhstan, said in an interview with Michael Matt of The Remnant newspaper that “the true friends of the Pope” are those cardinals bishops and laymen “who express their public concern about these very important issues, about the state of confusion in the Church. They are really the friends of the Pope.”

He called the concerns and calls for clarity, “an act of charity towards the Pope.” He added that he was convinced that when the Pope faces his judgment before God, “he will be thankful to those” cardinals, bishops and lay people who called on him to offer clarity.

Archbishop Schneider said that those who perform “adulation of the Pope” and “deny the evidence” that ambiguity in the Pope’s teachings is causing confusion are not helping the Pope nor themselves when they will face their final judgment. 

Regarding those who tell the Pope, “It’s all okay,” despite the “disastrous situation,” the archbishop warned that at their judgment God will ask them “what have you done when there was confusion, why have you not raised your voice to defend the truth?”

Bishop Schneider sees the Church as a “big family of God” and that within the family we have to have the opportunity to speak “without fear of being punished or isolated.” He noted that this “spirit of family” was “stressed that the second Vatican council” and that a “climate of family” should be fostered in the Church.

♛Glory, praise and honor be to Thee, Christ, O King!

Gloria, laus et honor tibi sit, Rex Christe

To Christ the King

O Christ Jesus, I acknowledge Thee to be the king of the universe; all that hath been made is created for Thee. Exercise over me all Thy sovereign rights. I hereby renew the promises of my baptism, renouncing Satan and all his works and pomps, and I engage myself to lead henceforth a truly Christian life. And in an especial manner do I undertake to bring about the triumph of the rights of God and Thy Church, so far as in me lies. Divine Heart of Jesus, I offer Thee my poor actions to obtain the acknowledgment by every heart of Thy sacred kingly power. In such wise may the kingdom of Thy peace be firmly established throughout all the earth. Amen.

Anglican Theologian Warns: This Pope Isn’t Catholic

The Remnant 

Written by  Christopher A. Ferrara

At this point in the Bergoglian Debacle, the recognition that Francis is a threat to the integrity of the Faith has become so well established in mainstream commentary that even an Anglican theologian, writing in First Things, has sounded the alarm.

“Is the pope Catholic? For at least a century, this was the way we Anglicans joked about anything that seemed too obvious to state,” writes Gerald McDermott, holder of a theology chair at Beeson Divinity School.  But, he continues: “Now we must ask in seriousness whether the pope is a liberal Protestant.”

McDermott cites numerous examples of the endless torrent of oral and written heterodoxy Francis has generated over the past four-and-a-half years.  Remnant readers are well familiar with them all, and there is no need to recapitulate them here.  Like concerned Catholics, McDermott focuses on the crowning insult of this destructive pontificate: Amoris Laetitia and its stupefying attempt to introduce situation ethics into Catholic moral theology.  

McDermott notes that John Finnis, the renowned Catholic legal philosopher, and the equally renowned moral theologian, Germain Grisez—both figures of the “conservative” Catholic mainstream who can hardly be labeled “radical traditionalists”—have charged that “according to the logic of Amoris Laetitia, some of the faithful are too weak to keep God’s commandments, and can live in grace while committing ongoing and habitual sins ‘in grave matter.’”  To which McDermott adds: “Like (Episcopalian) Joseph Fletcher, who taught Situation Ethics in the 1960s, the exhortation suggests that there are exceptions to every moral rule and that there is no such thing as an intrinsically evil act.”

“For decades,” McDermott continues, “orthodox Anglicans and other Protestants seeking to resist the apostasies of liberal Christianity have looked to Rome for moral and theological support. Most of us recognized that we were really fighting the sexual revolution, which had coopted and corrupted the Episcopal Church and its parent across the pond. First it was the sanctity of life and euthanasia. Then it was homosexual practice. Now it is gay marriage and transgender ideology. During the pontificates of John Paul II and Benedict XVI, we non-Catholics arguing moral theology could point to learned and compelling arguments coming out of Rome and say, in effect, ‘The oldest and largest part of the Body of Christ agrees with us, and it does so with remarkable sophistication.’”

But no longer, says McDermott:  “Those of us who continue to fight for orthodoxy, in dogmatic as well as moral theology, miss those days when there was a clear beacon shining from across the Tiber. For now, it seems, Rome itself has been infiltrated by the sexual revolution. The center is not holding.”

These observations are historic in their significance, as is the open letter to Francis by Fr. Thomas Weinandy, one of the most prominent Catholic theologians of the Novus Ordo mainstream. McDermott finds hope in the “brave and principled stand” Weinandy has taken against a wayward Pope like no other before him.   Expressing my own sentiments, McDermott concludes:  “Tom Weinandy reminds us that God raises up prophetic lights when dark days come to his Church.”

When even an Anglican theologian is publicly appalled by the liberal Protestantism of a Roman Pontiff, no Catholic of good will can continue to deny the obvious. But where is the neo-Catholic commentariat in the midst of this great awakening?  Committed as ever to their programmatic defense of the indefensible, lest anyone suspect that those radical traditionalists might have been right all along about the direction in which the Church has been heading since the Second Vatican Disaster, and that the neo-Catholic “normalist” narrative has been spectacularly wrong, if not outright dishonest, from the beginning.

As for the bishops and cardinals who must know this Pope is a menace to the Church, they continue to cower in obsequy or, at best, protest again and again that Francis must “clarify” what he has already made perfectly clear. Or, like Bishop Barron—elevated to the episcopacy by Francis—they complain that the crisis Francis has precipitated with Amoris Laetitia is all the fault of Catholic bloggers and that the bishops should “seize control of [the] process,” because these nefarious bloggers “are forcing people to read this document in a particular way.”  That Francis himself reads his own document in that particular way, and applauds its disastrous implementation accordingly, must never be mentioned. Rather, the truth must be hidden by “seizing control” of the narrative, replacing statements of the undeniable truth with flowery praise for what Barron calls “an extraordinarily rich document.”  

Would that the leaders of the Church spare us from “rich documents” and give us the faith of our fathers.  But there is no counting on them now.  The laity and their sensus fidelium are the primary bulwark of the Faith at present, assisted by the grace of the sacraments and the good priests, like Father Weinandy, who remain true to what God has revealed through His Church, despite the consequences they will suffer under a pontificate that represents a dictatorship of theological relativism, sustained only by raw power and the fear of reprisal, which the dictator dares to call “The Spirit”.