Prevost is a formal manifest heretic, approves of ‘Fiducia supplicans’ & ‘Amoris Laetitia’
Matthew 7:15-16 “Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravenous wolves. You will know them by their fruits.
“It is very clear that the election [as Pope] of a heretic, schismatic or woman would be null and void.”
“Those capable of being validly elected are all who are not prohibited by divine law or by an invalidating ecclesiastical law… Those who are barred as incapable of being validly elected are all women, children who have not reached the age of reason; also, those afflicted with habitual insanity, the unbaptized, heretics, schismatics…” (Wernz-Vidal, Jus Canonicum 1:415)
“[The vice of sodomy] leads to error, totally removes truth from the deluded mind... It opens up Hell and closes the gates of Paradise.” St. Peter Damian
Matthew 7:15-16 “Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravenous wolves. You will know them by their fruits.
Editor’s Note: Saint Pius X said that the worst heresy is Modernism, which holds that something are true for you and false for me etc.., which is this Cardinal’s vision about invoking the Thrice Holy Name of God to approve of sodomy.
I am publishing this article for historical record, and to warn Catholics not to accept such a man as validly elected to the apostolic see.
To be a formal manifest heretic, it is sufficient to have publicly stated that you are in favor of anything which contradicts Divine Revelation. But the Second Commandment is part of Divine Revelation, and no cleric can be ignorant of the fact that the Divine Name cannot be invoked to approve of any sin whatsoever, let alone that sin which cries out to God for vengeance. Thus all clergy who approve of ‘Fiducia supplicans’ in any way clearly separate themselves from Jesus Christ and the Catholic Church. For a cardinal who is a formal and manifest heretic, he still can vote in Conclave; however, in accord with the Bull of Pau IV, his election cannot be considered by anyone as valid, no matter what, not even if all the Cardinals say it is.
For more information about the gravity of the wickedness in approving of ‘Fiducia supplicans’ see FromRome.Info’s page “Contra Fiducia Supplicans“, which you can find linked in the upper menu of our website.
For more information about Pope Paul IV’s decree, see here.
Nine Months Ago: Cardinal Prevost Defends Francis' Judas Heresy – Gloria.tv
St. Robert Bellarmine: “It is probable and may piously be believed that not only as ‘Pope’ can the Supreme Pontiff not err, but he cannot be a heretic even as a particular person by pertinaciously believing something false against the faith” (De Romano Pontifice, Book IV, Ch. 6).
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.