Prevost’s sacrilegious and fruitless meeting with the Anglican heretic—who is pro-gay and pro-abortion—confirmed Mullally in her heresies. And she, mocking God, refuses to convert in order to continue profaning the priesthood

By their fruits you will recognize them.

Robert Prevost and his henchmen mock the sacrament of the priesthood and the Papacy instituted by Christ.

Prevost maliciously promotes fruitless 'ecumenical' encounters that, instead of achieving the conversion of heretics, entrench them in their heresies.

In an interview, the Anglican heretic Sarah Mullally declared that she felt encouraged by Leo XIV; she felt like a "pastor"—just like him.

The Anglican "Popess" committed another sacrilege by profaning another Catholic church, coordinated by the apostate Tagle.

In the afternoon, following the fruitless and sacrilegious meeting with the apostate Prevost, the apostate "Popess" of Canterbury, Sarah Mullally, presided over a sacrilegious parody of Vespers, profaning the Church of Saint Ignatius of Loyola, in complicity with Luis Antonio Tagle.

The Communion of the Profane of the False Church
 Gloria TV News

On 27 April, Mrs Sarah Mullally commissioned the Director of the Anglican Centre in Rome, Anthony Ball, as her representative to the Holy See. Despite the Anglicans having their own church in Rome, the ceremony took place at the Church of Saint Ignatius of Loyola. Cardinal Luis Antonio Tagle delivered a homily about an alleged "common faith and unity in Jesus Christ".

Archbishop of Canterbury on X: "Yesterday - Day three in Rome - I had the pleasure of commissioning Bishop Anthony Ball as the Archbishop of Canterbury’s representative to the Holy See. Bishop Anthony was commissioned in a beautiful choral evensong at the Chiesa di Sant’Ignazio Loyola. The service was full of https://t.co/HZrvleC8Gs" / X

 Titus 3:10-11 Warn a heretic once or twice, but afterward reject him. 11 You may be sure that such a person is perverted and sinful and stands self-condemned.

Instead of seeking the conversion of false religions, Prevost simultaneously draws various sects toward himself, granting each of them something in exchange for this "apostate union" with him.

With the support of apostate priests and laity—once Prevost had seized control of the Church's physical infrastructure, Catholic media outlets, and finances—he keeps a group of "deluded Catholics" in a state of deception; these individuals collaborate with evil, much as the Communists once labeled such collaborators "useful idiots." This phenomenon can only be explained—just as Scripture affirms—by the fact that they have fallen under a satanic spell, such that they themselves prefer to believe his lies, even while covering for and supporting him.

Prevost Promotes a False Peace and Apparent Solutions to the Division Among Christians in Exchange for Apostasy

For instance—cunningly—while Prevost allowed the desecration of the Tomb of Saint Peter to go unpunished, and joined in "prayer" with the Anglican heretic Mullally—a promoter of pro-homosexual and pro-abortion agendas who poses as a "popess"—he received her with honors and endorsed her sacrilegious parody of a priestess, rather than admonishing and correcting her. Much like corrupt politicians and demagogues, he cloaked his betrayal under the pretext of having sent a message to Anglicans: a message that, in reality, the "popess" herself shares on her social media. He spoke of a supposed effort to eliminate that "obstacle hindering the proclamation of the Gospel" and "the division among Christians"—which weakens their capacity to be effective bearers of that peace. This juggling of empty words is nothing more than demagogic rhetoric, for the very essence of the Anglican sect constitutes the obstacle itself and would have to cease to exist—a heretical essence that he himself acknowledged. Thus, in reality, this signifies nothing to the unrepentant Anglican heretic.

After publishing what Prevost said, she herself continued uploading videos to her social media accounts to demonstrate the support she receives from Prevost and his apostate cronies. And she continued her sacrilegious charade, acting as an Anglican "priestess and popess."

As Saint Augustine explains: by obstinately abusing God's mercy to continue sinning, Sarah Mullally does not show herself to be penitent; rather, on the contrary, she mocks God.

Furthermore, the website of the Anglican heretics in Rome shared a link to the official Vatican site, which contains the speech by the apostate Robert Prevost.

It also became clear that the apostate Community of Sant'Egidio was involved in backing the parody of the Anglican "papess."

Prevost employs the double standard of "yes" and "no"—an ambivalence that emanates from the Devil—a double morality and diabolical demagoguery—in the style of corrupt politicians—used to deceitfully win over a population that holds opposing views. It is comparable to the moment when Solomon committed apostasy by building a temple for each of his pagan wives, so that each might worship her own false god. It is the cunning of a harlot who keeps multiple lovers simultaneously, deceiving them all with her diabolical seductions.

Soloviev’s work, *Three Dialogues*, portrays the Antichrist as an ecumenist (the polytheist of Abu Dhabi), an environmentalist (the *Pachamamista* of *Laudato Si’*), and a pacifist (the Irenist heresy, wherein, within a pantheon of religions, false gods are invoked to implore a false and immanentist peace—one devoid of the Prince of Peace). It was with the kiss of peace that Judas betrayed Christ. The sign of peace is utilized to conceal the betrayal of Christ—a false peace that leads to apostasy.

As the *Catechism* explains, the religious imposture of the Antichrist—carried out under the guise of goodness, concealed within a form of Masonic and humanist philanthropy—feeds upon deception, promising apparent solutions in exchange for apostasy; at the same time, it notes that this satanic religious imposture unveils the “Mystery of Iniquity” that pursues those faithful Catholics who remain steadfast in the True Faith of Jesus Christ.

Soloviev noted that the Antichrist “will seek the consensus of all Christian confessions, granting something to each of them. The masses will follow him, with the exception of small groups of Catholics, Orthodox, and Protestants.”

He explains that he will grant something to each distinct and opposing Christian confession in order to win the favor of their adherents—specifically, he mentioned Protestants, the Orthodox, and Catholics. It is worth noting that Soloviev simply points out that the Antichrist establishes pacts with Christians, given that it is they who, by entering into an alliance with the Devil, become apostates—since those who worship false gods—such as the *Pachamamistas*, as well as idolatrous Muslims, along with all other false religions—already belong to him: all idolaters and atheists who violate the First Commandment belong to the Devil, just as do all unrepentant fornicators who rebel against God by transgressing divine natural law. And all those who, disobeying the laws of God, obstinately persist in sin.

Let us recall that, with the permission and suggestion of Prevost, the Church of the Gesù also was profaned by the apostate Francesco Savino with a sacrilegious Mass for homosexual concubines—a sacrilege instigated by Prevost himself.