Prevost maliciously used the name of the Holy Spirit and the name of Christ to endorse the heretical Anglican woman who poses as a bishop. This sin of malice against the Holy Spirit demonstrates that he is a blasphemer and a false prophet.
Unity Among the Wicked
Prevost repeatedly and maliciously confirmed the heretic—disguised as a bishop—in her heresy and in her invalid priesthood.
The impostor Robert Prevost, mocking the male priesthood instituted by Christ, began his speech by addressing the heretic Sarah Mullally—disguised as a bishop—: “Your Grace...”
Let us recall that the heretical figure of the Anglican sect—the Archbishop of Canterbury—is equivalent to a “synodal pope”: *first among equals*. Primus inter pares.
Primus inter pares
The Archbishop of Canterbury holds a unique position as the first among equals within the Anglican Communion. This title, often referred to as "Primus inter pares," signifies that while the Archbishop is formally equal to other bishops, they also possess significant leadership roles and influence within the Communion. The Archbishop serves as an Instrument of Communion, fostering unity among the 42 autonomous churches of the Anglican Communion and convening important gatherings like the Lambeth Conference. The title reflects both the equality and the unique responsibilities of the Archbishop, making them a pivotal figure in the global Anglican community.
Instead of fostering unity, the heretic—disguised as a bishop—Sarah Mullally (pro-homosexual, pro-abortion) has provoked division within the Anglican sect itself, as she holds positions contrary to the Scriptures. She contradicts the male priesthood instituted by Christ and, furthermore, defends immoral views that openly defy God's natural law, the Commandments, and Jesus Christ Himself.

Prevost to heretics: ‘We are already one!’
Prevost had endorsed the parody of the sacrament of the priesthood, allowing her—while dressed as a bishop—to desecrate the Tomb of Saint Peter and Saint Peter's Basilica, and to use the Church of Saint Ignatius of Loyola to perform the functions of a "bishop." Moreover, he permitted this pro-gay and pro-abortion heretic to act in his presence as if she were a legitimate priest, and as if he were of a lower rank; she even led Prevost in prayer, and he responded in unison. Prevost made himself a party to this parody—treating her at all times as if she were a priest equal to himself, without offering any admonition or correction of any kind. She herself stated that she felt encouraged by Prevost and felt, throughout the entire time, like a pastor just like him.
In an interview, the Anglican heretic Sarah Mullally declared that she felt encouraged by Leo XIV; she felt like a "pastor"—just like him.
And Prevost and his minions, by treating the heretic—disguised as a bishop—as one of their peers, and indeed by acting as her subordinates, acknowledged her false priesthood, in contempt of the priesthood and the papacy instituted by Christ, with the aim of humiliating the Church.
Jenny Holland: “Pope” Leo says justice and equality should "take priority” over Church’s teaching on sexual matters.
In his apostate speech, Prevost fails to point out that what he himself characterizes as " continuing challenges"—which have hindered full communion with Anglicans—are: schism, heresy, and apostasy; the invalidity of the ordination of women and homosexuals; and immoral practices that defy God's natural law and contradict Catholic morality, such as promoting the practice of sodomy. Which, moreover, contradict Scripture.
Prevost said: Nevertheless, we must not allow these continuing challenges * to prevent us from using every possible opportunity to proclaim Christ to the world together. As my beloved predecessor, Pope Francis, said to the Primates of the Anglican Communion in 2024, “it would be a scandal if, due to our divisions, we did not fulfil our common vocation to make Christ known” (Address to Primates of the Anglican Communion, 2 May 2024). For my part, I add that it would also be a scandal if we did not continue to work towards overcoming our differences, no matter how intractable they may appear.
To justify his betrayal, Prevost cited his accomplice Bergoglio, yet failed to mention that, under the pontificate of Pope Benedict, in 2010 the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith announced that the obstacle which derailed this effort toward communion with the Anglicans was the ordination of women.
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith
The decision of the Church of England to permit the ordination of women bishops was a step which would have a serious negative impact on full union with the Church
Pontifical Council for promoting Christian unity
Furthermore, in 2005, the Anglicans requested to put a hold on the meetings geared toward their full union with the Catholic Church in order to bless unions between persons of the same sex.

In his address to the heretic disguised as a bishop, Prevost maliciously utilized the name of Christ to execute his vengeance against His Church and His male priesthood—in collaboration with his henchmen—from the very Tomb of Saint Peter. Not only does she disguise herself as a Bishop, but he, too, disguises himself as a Pope, profaning and usurping the very Chair of Peter to consummate his vendetta. He carries out his vengeance against the Catholic Church and the Catholic priesthood—whom he perceives as the "oppressors" through the Marxist lens he acquired from the pseudo-theology of Gustavo Gutiérrez in Peru—thereby contradicting the assertion that the Catholic Church was founded by Jesus Christ. But not only that: defying the Scriptures, he rebels against the male priesthood instituted by Christ; moreover, he maliciously promoted the satanic parody of a priestess and endorsed her illicit power to exercise episcopal functions.

Defying Christ, the heretical Anglican woman—disguised as a bishop—Sarah Mullally, insinuates that the male priesthood instituted by Christ is an injustice.
@JhWesten ‘Archbishop’ Sarah Mullally was asked if she discussed women priests with Pope Leo XIV. She dodges: ‘I’m not a politician’ — then hints it came up as a ‘matter of justice.’
First of all, the question of whether she—while disguised as a bishop—had spoken with Prevost regarding the ordination of women was ridiculous. For Prevost had endorsed the travesty of the sacrament of the priesthood, allowing her—while disguised as a bishop—to desecrate the Tomb of Saint Peter and Saint Peter’s Basilica, and to use the Church of Saint Ignatius of Loyola to perform the functions of a "bishop." Moreover, he permitted her to act in his presence as if she were a legitimate priest, leading the prayer; and—making himself a party to the travesty—he treated her at all times as if she were a priest, offering neither admonition nor correction of any kind.

When Prevost promoted the sacrilegious "informal" blessing for unrepentant homosexual concubines, he revealed his synodal and Marxist agenda: "Justice (synonymous with Marxist liberation), equality (advocated by gender ideology), and freedom of religion (to worship false gods)—all of this would take priority over that particular issue (over the Church's teaching prohibiting the sin of blessing fornication and homosexual cohabitation)."
2 Corinthians 11:13-16
For such false apostles are deceitful workmen, transforming themselves into the apostles of Christ.
And no wonder: for Satan himself transformeth himself into an angel of light.
Therefore it is no great thing if his ministers be transformed as the ministers of justice, whose end shall be according to their works.
Robert Prevost committed a sin of malice
Prevost mocks the priesthood instituted by Christ.
Apostate Robert Prevost: “To The Most Reverend and Right Honourable Dame Sarah Mullally Archbishop of Canterbury”
Brothers—in case you have not yet grasped it—allow me to translate this for you into the very language of Marxist liberation pseudo-theology. Do you not realize that the war Prevost is waging is against Christ and His Church? This ideology teaches that the Catholic Church—Christ, His Church, and His male priesthood—are precisely the oppressors against whom they fight to defend the rendering of "justice" to (heretical) Protestants, to Jews who reject Christ, to pagans (Pachamamists), to idolatrous Muslims and all other false religions, to blasphemous atheists, and to all the unrepentant—such as sodomites, adulterers, and the like.
CONGREGATION FOR THE DOCTRINE OF THE FAITH
'Professio fidei'