"IT IS A GRAVE OFFENSE NOT TO WORK FOR THE EXTERMINATION OF HERESY WHEN THIS MONSTROUS INFECTION REQUIRES ACTION"
— Council of Vienne ♰♰♰


Wednesday, December 10, 2025

New evidence of the heretical deviations of the apostate homosexual Tucho Fernández

 

Tucho's pornographic writings demonstrate that in Argentina he openly defied divine Natural Law and contradicted Catholic morality.


Bull of Pope Paul IV Against Heretics: "Cum Ex Apostolatus Officio"

The Magisterium of the Church has decreed in perpetuity that the elevation of a heretic to any hierarchical office is invalid and null. On the same day that Bergoglio invalidly elevated the homosexual Tucho and Cobo as "cardinals," he also elevated Prevost, with the intention that these homosexual activists would solidify their rebellion against God and against the Church.








Prevost and Tucho are enemies of the Kingdom of Christ. And those who oppose Christ are called antichrists. To join Prevost and Tucho is to join the antichrist. And it is to abandon the Church to become part of the Anti-Church.

By not revoking Fiducia Supplicans and Amoris Laetitia, Tucho and Prevost continue to attack the Sacrament of Marriage, and with this they demonstrate the element of obstinacy in their heresy and apostasy



Archbishop Fernández previously argued in favor of condom use, contradicting Catholic doctrine - LifeSite


"Tucho"  Fernández : "More than a friend, I am Bergoglio's son. His words have marked me for the rest of my life"

Cardinal Müller Confirms Vatican Doctrinal Office Had File Warning About Archbishop Fernández| National Catholic Register



 Mariologists Rebuke Tucho's anti-Marian document, calling it erroneous and unfortunate

                                "Authority" of a Pornographer


Tuesday, December 9, 2025

Mariologists Rebuke Tucho's anti-Marian document, calling it erroneous and unfortunate

 



In a 23-page response, the International Marian Association Theological Commission (IMA) highlights what it sees as significant errors and omissions in Cardinal Tucho Fernández’s doctrinal note Mater Populi Fidelis. Key phrases:

- If the title Co-redemptrix is always inappropriate or inopportune to use, then the popes, saints and mystics who approved or used the title were acting in an inappropriate and imprudent manner.

- Members of the IMA Theological Commission who have taught Mariology for decades certainly do not find the title Co-redemptrix ‘unhelpful’.

- While it is appropriate that Mater Populi Fidelis acknowledges papal uses of the title Co-redemptrix, it is unfortunate that these papal uses are not given greater respect or presence in the actual text.

- It is unusual that a doctrinal note of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith would quote at length a secular interview by a cardinal prefect, and at the same time, not include over ten papal usages of the same title.
- It is also unusual that Mater Populi Fidelis essentially omits Lumen Gentium n. 58, which is arguably the most co-redemptive passage of Vatican II concerning Mary.

- It is inaccurate for the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith to say that ‘Some popes have used the title “Co-redemptrix” without elaborating much on its meaning’. Pius XI and John Paul II explain Mary’s role as Co-redemptrix quite clearly, and they do so in terms that the Dicastery describes as ‘immediate, Christo-typical or maximalist cooperation’.

- One of the prominent doctrinal omissions in Mater Populi Fidelis is that, while it speaks of Mary’s unique active role in the Redemption, it never states that Mary’s unique active role is redemptive.

- The text seeks to reduce Mary’s maternal mediation only to intercession.

- Such an assessment, however, fails to take into account the consistent papal teachings on Mary’s universal mediation of grace going back to the 18th century and up to and including the pontificate of Pope Francis.

Mater Populi Fidelis speaks in general of the spiritual motherhood of Mary, but it reduces it to a type of intercession that only encourages us ‘to open our hearts to Christ’s activity in the Holy Spirit’. What is missing is a true presentation of Mary’s authentic spiritual motherhood, which includes her maternal role in the spiritual conception, generation, birth and nourishment of souls.

- It is unfortunate that the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith would choose to omit repeated teachings and references of twelve popes over four centuries of what constitute numerous higher-level expressions of ordinary Papal Magisterium concerning the Catholic doctrinal teaching of Mary as the Mediatrix of all graces.

- What new insights have emerged in the few years since these great post-conciliar saints, as well as St. John Paul II, that make a title used by these popes, saints, and mystics to be described now as ‘always inappropriate?’ This, rather, appears to be an anti-development of doctrine.

- The emphasis on Christ’s merit is used against the legitimacy of the true human merit of Mary.

- Minimizing Mary’s merits also undermines all human merit and cooperation in the work of Redemption.

Mater Populi Fidelis repeatedly speaks of the ‘risks’ of using the Co-redemptrix title… It likewise warns of the dangers in seeing Mary as the Mediatrix of all graces… However, it is precisely these teachings that constitute the perpetual doctrine of the Church—from their seed form in Scripture, to the Patristic model of Mary as the New Eve, up to modern and contemporary popes.

- The ‘risks’ posited appear more theoretical than real. It would be difficult to find within the Church a single reputable Catholic author in the last three centuries who taught that the Co-redemptrix title denotes that Mary is divine or an equal redeemer parallel to Jesus.

- To propose, instead, a Redemption based on ‘Jesus alone’ bereft of any human redemptive value on the part of Mary, seems to resemble more a Protestant theology of Redemption than that of the Catholic Church.

For the record:






Sunday, December 7, 2025

Why Liberalism and Socialism Hate the Dogma of the Immaculate Conception so Much

 


By TFP LA

“Why Liberalism and Socialism Hate the Dogma of the Immaculate Conception so Much.” was the topic of the latest Ladies Talk and Tea. It was held in Lafayette, the heart of Acadiana.

A short answer is to be found in the affirmation that of all creatures, only Mary (and naturally her Divine Son Jesus) was conceived without the stain of original sin. This makes her unequal to the rest of the human race. It places her in a unique, privileged place in God’s Creation and Divine Plan. For the liberal who believes that the individual is without the effects of original sin, or the socialist who believes the masses are, this anti-egalitarian act of God inspires not admiration but hatred. And this applies to Catholics influenced either by the liberalism of the French Revolution or the socialism of the Russian Revolution.

Our country was consecrated to Our Lady of the Immaculate Conception on May 13, 1846. That was years before Blessed Pius IX proclaimed the dogma as a truth of the Universal Church. In 1584 there was a chapel dedicated to the Immaculate Conception in St. Augustine, Florida. Fr. Marquette, the French Jesuit, in 1673 named the Mississippi the River of the Immaculate Conception. And then we cannot forget that in Lourdes, to the chagrin of liberal Catholics of the time, Our Lady described herself as “The Immaculate Conception.”

Alone, of all the Children of Adam, Mary was conceived Immaculate

Francis Denying Immaculate Conception: “Mary Not Born A Saint”


Bergoglio: "And you will tell me: of course! They are Our Lady and Saint Joseph! Yes, but let us not think it was easy for them: saints are not born, they become thus, and this is true for them too".


Salvini Remembers the Immaculate Conception, and the Italian Bishops Attack Salvini 

Bergoglio does not believe in the dogma of the Immaculate Conception of Mary

Bergoglio Suggests Mary Did Not Intend to Be ‘Ever Virgin’

Mary surely she wanted to say to the Angel: ‘Liar! I was deceived.’

Devotion to Our Lady of the Mystical Rose emphasizes Mary's role as mediatrix of all graces

 


O Rosa Mystica, who with maternal love, cooperated with the mystery of the Incarnation of the Eternal Word, and, by your powerful intercession, grant us the grace of true faith, hope, and charity, and the gift of perseverance in a holy life, that we may one day be united with you and your Divine Son in Heaven. Amen.


Our Lady of the Mystical Rose:
First Apparition of the Virgin with the Swords:
- The first sword: The unworthy celebration of Holy Mass and unworthy reception of Holy Communion.
- The second sword: Those who are unfaithful or abandon their priestly or religious vocation.
- The third sword: Betrayal of the faith.

Our Lady of the Mystical Rose:
Then, with a face full of sadness, the Virgin said: “At this time, the Christians of your Italian nation are the ones who offend Our Lord, my Divine Son, the most, with sins against holy purity.



Bishop Strickland To The Faithful: Holding the Nicaean Line

 Holding the Nicaean Line - Pillars of Faith


Prevost calls into question the infallibility of the Church.

Bishop Strickland denounces Prevost's heretic document on the Council of Nicaea, which rejects the deposit of Faith under the pretext of seeking unity without conversion and treats the Church as if it were an institution of human invention where Truth is subject to revision and willing to compromise on faith in order to coexist with the world.


Let us remember that we are talking about this apostate who denies the Holy Trinity and opposes the reign of Christ in society and in souls.






We are talking about an apostate who promotes heresy in matters of faith and morals.
















Bishop Eleganti: By Its Own Admission, Islam is an Anti-Christian Religion



Saturday, December 6, 2025

The wicked anti-Catholic and homosexual activist Jorge Bergoglio has bequeathed money to the apostate and pro-homosexual Argentinian nun Lucía Caram



Gloria TV News

Pope Francis, who died in April 2025, set aside funds in his will for a humanitarian project run by Dominican sister Lucía Caram, she said in remarks reported by Spanish media. According to Sister Caram, the funds were explicitly intended to support medical care in war-affected areas of Ukraine, in particular the purchase of ambulances. The exact amount designated in the pope’s will has not been disclosed.




Sister Caram said that Francis had expressed support for her work on several occasions: “I never imagined it would come in this form.”




Born in Argentina, Sister Caram has lived in Spain for about thirty years. She became widely known for her homosexual activism. She stated that Our Lady was “not a virgin”, supported homosexual "marriages" and said that homosexual sins are “love.” In 2023, she acknowledged that Francis is a friend of active homosexuals and transvestites, and claimed that he had recently “appointed a homosexual as prefect of a very important Vatican dicastery,” obviously referring to Cardinal Tucho Fernández.

 2 Corinthians 11:13-16

Such people are false apostles, dishonest workers who masquerade as apostles of Christ. And no wonder! Even Satan masquerades as an angel of light. Therefore, it should not be considered unusual that his servants also disguise themselves as ministers of righteousness. Their end will be appropriate to their deeds.