"IT IS A GRAVE OFFENSE NOT TO WORK FOR THE EXTERMINATION OF HERESY WHEN THIS MONSTROUS INFECTION REQUIRES ACTION"
— Council of Vienne ♰♰♰


Tuesday, December 16, 2025

Fr. Gerry Murray on Prevost's Anti-Doctrine Chief, anti-Marian Pervert Tucho Fernández: “This man should be fired” Fernández has “demonstrated he is completely unsuited to be a pastor of souls, he' s doing things that pornographers do”

 

Fr. Murray: Cardinal Fernández ‘Should be Fired’ by Pope Leo Over ‘Pornographic’ Texts


Gloria TV News



Firing Tucho is a benchmark for Leo XIV:

New York canon lawyer and priest Gerald Murray is urging Pope Leo XIV to remove Cardinal Víctor “Tucho” Fernández as prefect of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith. Speaking with journalist Raymond Arroyo, Rev Murray called Fernández’s recently resurfaced pornographic writings “a total disgrace” and “a horrendous production done by a priest”. Tucho is “completely unsuited to be a pastor of souls”.


Rev Murray recalled that Pope Francis justified Tucho’s earlier books as writings of a younger priest. However, the newly revealed books were written until 2009, when Tucho was aged 46: “If we were doing a profile, a criminal profile, about a sex abuser, and I’m not saying he is a sex abuser, but if you saw this literature coming out and you would say to yourself, ‘Well, it’s quite clear that the sex abuser got started a long time ago.’” The conclusion: “He should be fired.” And: “This is going to be a benchmark for Pope Leo XIV. This man should be fired. He is unsuited.”


Friday, December 12, 2025

The 46 stars on the Virgin of Guadalupe's mantle prove that Bergoglio and Prevost are not legitimate Popes

 These 46 stars on the tilma represent the 46 popes since the apparition of Our Lady of Guadalupe in 1531.  They also correlate with the prophecies of Garabandal, which indicate that the End Times began after Benedict XVI.

The Popes under the protection of the mantle of the Virgin of Guadalupe range from the Council of Trent to Pope Benedict XVI.

Neither Bergoglio nor Prevost appear on the Virgin of Guadalupe's mantle.


⭐The 46 stars on the mantle of the Virgin of Guadalupe do not recognize the last two impostors as popes.




The image of the Virgin in the Book of Revelation

Therefore, the tilma brings us the message that Our Lady of Guadalupe is the apocalyptic revelation of the Bible.

On the cloak that covers the Blessed Virgin Mary, which is blue and has 46 stars, these 46 stars are arranged in the exact same way as they appeared in the sky on the night of December 12, 1531, the night the apparition occurred.

Obviously, there are many more stars in the night sky, hundreds of them, but only these 46 are represented on the cloak.

It has been said, for example, that the Corona Borealis constellation on the Virgin's forehead is a message about the royalty of the Blessed Virgin Mary, Queen of Heaven and Earth.

The constellation of Virgo, represented over the Virgin's heart, has been seen as confirmation that the figure depicted is the Blessed Virgin Mary. And the constellation of Leo on Mary's abdomen serves as a reminder that the image on the cloak represents a woman carrying the King of the Universe.

The researcher Alessandro Masano has recently made a discovery that more clearly reveals the apocalyptic message of the tilma. In 1531, when the apparition occurred, the reigning Pope was Clement VII, who died in 1534. And from him to Benedict XVI, there are exactly 46 Popes, the same number as the stars on the tilma.

The stars are grouped into constellations in the sky, each containing hundreds of stars. But on the tilma, only a few stars from each of the 14 constellations are shown because each star in the constellation corresponds to a name adopted by a Pope.

For example, there are nine stars in the "Ursa Major" constellation depicted on the tilma, and there have been nine popes named Pius since 1531. There are seven stars in Scorpio, and there have been seven popes named Clement. There are five stars in Centaurus, and there have been five popes named Innocent.


Furthermore, only three Popes named Leo appear on the Virgin of Guadalupe's mantle. The name Francis does not appear either.


There are also constellations with only one star, and it so happens that there are also four popes with unique names: Julius, John, Sixtus, and Marcellus.


Therefore, the apparition of Our Lady of Guadalupe is a revelation for the End Times, with all that this implies.




The Virgin Mary led the indigenous people out of paganism, but Prevost, like the reprobate Jorge Bergoglio, confirms them in paganism.

The ecumenical heresy promoted by Bergoglio and Prevost is an attack against the teachings of Our Lady of Guadalupe


Scalfari: Francis' Goal Is One World Religion




No Greater Enemy of Our Lady Than Modern Ecumenism: Priest and Martyr Maximilian Kolbe


That was written by the martyr in 1933.
Maximilian said, “There is no greater enemy of the Immaculata and her Knighthood than today’s ecumenism, which every Knight must not only fight against, but also neutralize through diametrically opposed action and ultimately destroy.” (Entry of Diary dated April 23, 1933. Cited from The Immaculata Our Ideal, Father Karl Stehlin [Warsaw: Te Deum, 2005], p.37. – [4] Entry of Diary dated April 23, 1933. Cited from The Immaculata Our Ideal, Father Karl Stehlin [Warsaw: Te Deum, 2005], p.37)

                                
“God has never made or formed but one enmity; but it is an irreconcilable one, which shall endure and develop even to the end. It is between Mary, His worthy Mother, and the devil,—between the children and the servants of the Blessed Virgin and the children and instruments of Lucifer. The most terrible of all the enemies which God has set up against the devil is His holy Mother, Mary. He has inspired her, even since the days of the earthly Paradise, though she existed then only in His idea, with so much hatred against that cursed enemy of God, with so much industry in unveiling the malice of that old serpent, with so much power to conquer, to overthrow, and to crush that proud impious rebel, that he fears her not only more than all Angels and men, but in some sense more than God Himself. It is not that the anger, the hatred, and the power of God are not infinitely greater than those of the Blessed Virgin, for the perfections of Mary are limited, but it is, first, because Satan, being proud, suffers infinitely more from being beaten and punished by a little and humble handmaid of God, and her humility humbles him more than the Divine power; and, secondly, because God has given Mary such a great power against the devils, that, as they have often been obliged to confess, in spite of themselves, by the mouths of the possessed, they fear one of her sighs for a soul more than the prayers of all the Saints, and one of her menaces against them more than all other torments.”
― St. Louis de Montfort, True Devotion to Mary: With Preparation for Total Consecration




Wednesday, December 10, 2025

New evidence of the heretical deviations of the apostate homosexual Tucho Fernández

 

Tucho's pornographic writings demonstrate his heretical past in Argentina and his obstinacy in his rebellion against God's natural law and defiance of Catholic morality.



Bull of Pope Paul IV Against Heretics: "Cum Ex Apostolatus Officio"

The Magisterium of the Church has decreed in perpetuity that the elevation of a heretic to any hierarchical office is invalid and null. On the same day that Bergoglio invalidly elevated the homosexual Tucho and Cobo as "cardinals," he also elevated Prevost, with the intention that these homosexual activists would solidify their rebellion against God and against the Church.








Prevost and Tucho are enemies of the Kingdom of Christ. And those who oppose Christ are called antichrists. To join Prevost and Tucho is to join the antichrist. And it is to abandon the Church to become part of the Anti-Church.

By not revoking Fiducia Supplicans and Amoris Laetitia, Tucho and Prevost continue to attack the Sacrament of Marriage, and with this they demonstrate the element of obstinacy in their heresy and apostasy



Archbishop Fernández previously argued in favor of condom use, contradicting Catholic doctrine - LifeSite


"Tucho"  Fernández : "More than a friend, I am Bergoglio's son. His words have marked me for the rest of my life"

Cardinal Müller Confirms Vatican Doctrinal Office Had File Warning About Archbishop Fernández| National Catholic Register



 Mariologists Rebuke Tucho's anti-Marian document, calling it erroneous and unfortunate

                                "Authority" of a Pornographer


Tuesday, December 9, 2025

Mariologists Rebuke Tucho's anti-Marian document, calling it erroneous and unfortunate

 



In a 23-page response, the International Marian Association Theological Commission (IMA) highlights what it sees as significant errors and omissions in Cardinal Tucho Fernández’s doctrinal note Mater Populi Fidelis. Key phrases:

- If the title Co-redemptrix is always inappropriate or inopportune to use, then the popes, saints and mystics who approved or used the title were acting in an inappropriate and imprudent manner.

- Members of the IMA Theological Commission who have taught Mariology for decades certainly do not find the title Co-redemptrix ‘unhelpful’.

- While it is appropriate that Mater Populi Fidelis acknowledges papal uses of the title Co-redemptrix, it is unfortunate that these papal uses are not given greater respect or presence in the actual text.

- It is unusual that a doctrinal note of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith would quote at length a secular interview by a cardinal prefect, and at the same time, not include over ten papal usages of the same title.
- It is also unusual that Mater Populi Fidelis essentially omits Lumen Gentium n. 58, which is arguably the most co-redemptive passage of Vatican II concerning Mary.

- It is inaccurate for the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith to say that ‘Some popes have used the title “Co-redemptrix” without elaborating much on its meaning’. Pius XI and John Paul II explain Mary’s role as Co-redemptrix quite clearly, and they do so in terms that the Dicastery describes as ‘immediate, Christo-typical or maximalist cooperation’.

- One of the prominent doctrinal omissions in Mater Populi Fidelis is that, while it speaks of Mary’s unique active role in the Redemption, it never states that Mary’s unique active role is redemptive.

- The text seeks to reduce Mary’s maternal mediation only to intercession.

- Such an assessment, however, fails to take into account the consistent papal teachings on Mary’s universal mediation of grace going back to the 18th century and up to and including the pontificate of Pope Francis.

Mater Populi Fidelis speaks in general of the spiritual motherhood of Mary, but it reduces it to a type of intercession that only encourages us ‘to open our hearts to Christ’s activity in the Holy Spirit’. What is missing is a true presentation of Mary’s authentic spiritual motherhood, which includes her maternal role in the spiritual conception, generation, birth and nourishment of souls.

- It is unfortunate that the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith would choose to omit repeated teachings and references of twelve popes over four centuries of what constitute numerous higher-level expressions of ordinary Papal Magisterium concerning the Catholic doctrinal teaching of Mary as the Mediatrix of all graces.

- What new insights have emerged in the few years since these great post-conciliar saints, as well as St. John Paul II, that make a title used by these popes, saints, and mystics to be described now as ‘always inappropriate?’ This, rather, appears to be an anti-development of doctrine.

- The emphasis on Christ’s merit is used against the legitimacy of the true human merit of Mary.

- Minimizing Mary’s merits also undermines all human merit and cooperation in the work of Redemption.

Mater Populi Fidelis repeatedly speaks of the ‘risks’ of using the Co-redemptrix title… It likewise warns of the dangers in seeing Mary as the Mediatrix of all graces… However, it is precisely these teachings that constitute the perpetual doctrine of the Church—from their seed form in Scripture, to the Patristic model of Mary as the New Eve, up to modern and contemporary popes.

- The ‘risks’ posited appear more theoretical than real. It would be difficult to find within the Church a single reputable Catholic author in the last three centuries who taught that the Co-redemptrix title denotes that Mary is divine or an equal redeemer parallel to Jesus.

- To propose, instead, a Redemption based on ‘Jesus alone’ bereft of any human redemptive value on the part of Mary, seems to resemble more a Protestant theology of Redemption than that of the Catholic Church.

For the record: