Trent condemns Bergoglio's Heresy in Amoris Laetitia and his answer regarding on gay Priests: who am I to judge?

Who am I to judge a gay (priest)? is the heresy of justification by faith alone condemned by the Council of Trent.

Council of Trent, Session VI, Chapter XV:

 Against the subtle wits of some also, who by pleasing speeches and good words seduce the hearts of the innocent, it must be maintained that the grace of justification once received is lost not only by infidelity, whereby also faith itself is lost, but also by every other mortal sin, though in this case ...faith is not lost; thus defending the teaching of the divine law which excludes from the kingdom of God not only unbelievers, but also the faithful [who are] fornicators, adulterers, effeminate, (sodomites) liars with mankind, thieves, covetous, drunkards, railers, extortioners,[See I Cor. 6:9f.; 1 Tim. 1:9f.] and all others who commit deadly sins, from which with the help of divine grace they can refrain, and on account of which they are cut off from the grace of Christ.

Matthew 7:21-27 Concerning Self-Deception

21 “Not every one who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ shall enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of my Father who is in heaven.  22 On that day many will say to me, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and cast out demons in your name, and do many mighty works in your name?’  23 And then will I declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from me, you evildoers.’

The Council of Trent. Session VI, Canon 9.
 "If anyone says that the sinner is justified by faith alone, meaning that nothing else is required to cooperate in order to obtain the grace of justification, and that it is not in any way necessary that he be prepared and disposed by the action of his own will, let him be anathema." - 

ON THE MOST HOLY SACRAMENT OF THE EUCHARIST 
(Council of Trent, under the Supreme Pontiff, Julius III)
CANON XI.-lf any one saith, that faith alone is a sufficient preparation for receiving the sacrament of the most holy Eucharist; let him be anathema. And for fear lest so great a sacrament may be received unworthily, and so unto death and condemnation, this holy Synod ordains and declares, that sacramental confession, when a confessor may be had, is of necessity to be made beforehand, by those whose conscience is burthened with mortal sin, how contrite even soever they may think themselves. But if any one shall presume to teach, preach, or obstinately to assert, or even in public disputation to defend the contrary, he shall be thereupon excommunicated.  

Heresy On 8 April 2016

“It can no longer simply be said that all those in any ‘irregular’ situation [adultery, fornication,Sodomites] are living in a state of mortal sin and are deprived of sanctifying grace.  More is involved here than mere ignorance of the rule.”  (Amoris Laetitia 301) 
It [conscience] can also recognize with sincerity and honesty what for now is the most generous response which can be given to God, and come to see with a certain moral security that it is what God himself is asking amid the concrete complexity of one’s limits, while yet not fully the objective ideal. (Amoris Laetitia 303)

Council of Trent, Session VI, Canon XVIII:
“If any one saith, that the commandments of God are, even for one that is justified and constituted in grace, impossible to keep; let him be anathema.” 

Canon XXVII.-If any one saith, that there is no mortal sin but that of infidelity; or, that grace once received is not lost by any other sin, however grievous and enormous, save by that of infidelity ; let him be anathema. 

Canon XIV.-If any one saith, that man is truly absolved from his sins and justified, because that he assuredly believed himself absolved and justified; or, that no one is truly justified but he who believes himself justified; and that, by this faith alone, absolution and justification are effected; let him be anathema. 

Council of Trent Session XXIV, Doctrine concerning the Sacrament of Marriage. 

If anyone says that the Church errs in that she taught and teaches that in accordance with evangelical and apostolic doctrine the bond of matrimony cannot be dissolved by reason of adultery on the part of one of the parties, and that both, or even the innocent party who gave no occasion for adultery, cannot contract another marriage during the lifetime of the other, and that he is guilty of adultery who, having put away the adulteress, shall marry another, and she also who, having put away the adulterer, shall marry another,[*] let him be anathema. 

 *Matt. 5:32; 19:9; Mark 10:11 f.; Luke 16:18; I Cor. 7:10 f.; cc.5-8, 10, C.XXXII, q.7.

Can. 5. If anyone says that the bond of matrimony can be dissolved on account of heresy,[*] or irksome cohabitation, or by reason of the voluntary absence of one of the parties, let him be anathema. 

*Cf. c.4, X, De consang. IV, 14; cc.6, 7, X, De divor., IV, 19.

A Lesbian Lutheran bishop and the Primate of Swede are expecting that Bergoglio change the Catholic doctrine.

Marxist Eva Brunne Gay Pride.

ABC Digital October 27, 2016

Francis represents a "hope" to change the Catholic doctrine on homosexuality and women's ordination. But there still a long way to go estimate Lutheran ministers (Antje Jackelen and Eva Brunne) on Monday welcoming Bergoglio to Sweden. 

The Scandinavian Lutheran church authorized the ordination of women since 1960 and have performed same sex weddings  since 2009.

Lesbian Eva Brunne with her partner Gunilla Lindén. The Gay couple adopt a child.

 

Swedish lesbian Marxist bishop Eva Brunne is participating in a “rainbow-shabbat”

  

Eva Brunne Gay Pride.

Antje Jackelen is a militant in favor of pseudo-homosexual marriage, she rejects the authority of the Bible on homosexuality.

Antje Jackelen is the Lutheran 'Archbishop' of Uppsala in Sweden and Primate (prima inter pares) of the church of Sweden.

Her plan was to remove crosses from church and replace it with an arrow to Mecca to make it more inviting for Muslims.

"Sodoma and Gomorra"

Franco Coppola recommends to Mexican that instead of following the Gospel follow the apostate Bergoglio.

Franco Coppola replied that he will follow the example given by pope Francis, who has preached that homosexuals should be accompanied not just repeat what is written in books.

He argued that all people who are part of the community of sexual diversity should enjoy the same rights as other Mexicans.

He said that the members of the Catholic Church who want to pronounce on the subject first should follow the example of Pope Francis and accompany the lives of homosexual.

(Spanish)

Bergoglio's Mexican Nuncio defends the ‘rights’ to practice sodomy.

Franco Coppola, calls to find a “Mexican way” on the debate of gay civil unions:

 “I can answer with the doctrine of the Church, but it is not an answer that as a pastor I should give.”

Later he commented on the position of Pope Francis, who has shown greater openness about it. He called to know the problems of people to not offer as pastors what is written in books. Therefore suggested check for if egalitarian marriages fall into some rights protected by the (Human right) convention, “which is not the Gospel,” but may contain the inclusion of new guarantees. La Jornada

El Universal: His answer to the question if homosexuals should have the same rights as the rest of Mexicans: “Sure they are people, there is no reason to deny rights to men and women.”

He said that all people who are part of the community of sexual diversity should enjoy the same rights as other Mexicans.

And he answered the question if same-sex marriage is a right? If something is written in the universal human rights convention, it is true. Of course, it is not the gospel, can be discovered, found new rights. Then you have to see.

Bergoglio supported gay adoption

The Anti- apostolic Nuncio to Mexico is playing the same game that apostate Cardinal Bergolio did in Argentina back in 2010, supported Same-Sex Civil Unions, during their national debate regarding gay civil unions.

On March 19, The New York Times reported that when Argentina was gearing up for a bitter national debate on gay marriage in 2009 and 2010, Bergoglio quietly favored a compromise solution that would have included civil unions for same-sex couples.

John L. Allen of the National Catholic Report writes: „I was told by three sources in Argentina that the Times basically got it right: Bergoglio did, in fact, favor civil unions.“

Boff: ‘Bergoglio permitted homo couple to adopt child’ Apostate Sor Lucía Caram:“Pope Francisco when he was archbishop of Buenos Aires he had already baptized children of gay couples”

Bergoglio ridicules obedience to God's law.

Flashback: The Superior General of the Jesuits does not recommend Bergoglio be made Bishop, for having an unbalanced personality.

“He’s a man that’s sick with power.” 
Msgr. Adriano Bernardini, the then nuncio to Argentina speaking about Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio

RORATE CÆLI:
«The superiors of religious orders and societies are consulted by the Congregation for Bishops when their priestly members are considered for an appointment as bishop.

It is a well known and established information in the Holy See (as it was in Buenos Aires before) that, when Father Jorge Mario Bergoglio, SJ, was tipped by the then-Archbishop of Buenos Aires, Cardinal Quarracino, to become his auxiliary, in 1992, the then-Superior General of the Society of Jesus, Father Peter Hans Kolvenbach -- who was struggling to recover some credibility to his order after the severe intervention by Pope John Paul II and the removal of Arrupe and Arrupists who had run the great Society to the ground following the Council -- wrote an unfavorable report on the possible nomination.

The report is said to be highly detailed, and to reveal all the character inclinations that are evident in the personality of the current Pope.

Now, it would be one of the scoops of the century if a journalist revealed to the world this most important historical document. The "grown-up" Catholics of our age, "emancipated" by Vatican II, can surely take what Father Kolvenbach was trying to warn Pope John Paul II and his advisers about Father Bergoglio. And surely the new enlightened Vatican can be transparent enough to let all Catholics and all others know the contents of such a precious report. 
Time to let the sunlight in».

Link

Also in Spanish: The Wanderer

 

Bergoglio has an impediment to becoming pope as a Jesuit.

The false testimony and perjury, are crimes against public faith.

Bergoglio committed sin of perjury when he violated his priestly oath that all Jesuits make to God, to don't aspire or accept high ecclesiastical offices, which is an impediment keeping them from becoming pope. By breaking the oath he committed a mortal sin against the Second Commandment.

2016-10-18  The progressive Marxist Arturo Sosa, the new general, of the neo- Jesuits said:

"I think Mulemi is better suited for it. Regarding being called the 'black pope,' I don't like it.  Because the Jesuits, as probably many of you know we make a vow, a promise of neither aspire nor accept ecclesiastical offices ”  

Romereports edited the quote

“He’s a man that’s sick with power.”

Msgr. Adriano Bernardini, the then nuncio to Argentina
speaking about Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio

In the New York Times article Laurie Goodsteinmarch wrote:

Men who join the Jesuits, the Roman Catholic Church’s largest religious order, take vows of poverty, chastity and obedience, and promise never to take any high office in the church.

The Jesuits are distinguished by their vow to obey the pope and to serve where he commands. The Rev. Antonio Spadaro, editor of La Civiltà Cattolica, a Jesuit journal in Rome, said in an interview that before the papal conclave, journalists were asking him whether Cardinal Bergoglio could be pope.

“And I said, ‘Not at all, because he’s a Jesuit,’ ” Father Spadaro said in an interview in his office on Friday. “We are used to serving a pope, not to be a pope.”
The Rev. Federico Lombardi, a Jesuit who serves as the Vatican spokesman, said that when he saw Cardinal Bergoglio emerge on the balcony of St. Peter’s Basilica as the new pope, “I was dumbfounded.”

The Jesuit Bartolomeo Sorge, about  Bergoglio's "election",  said:

"We, the Jesuits can be neither Monsignori, or bishops, indeed we vow to reject all ecclesiastical dignities. Much less, therefore, it was not foreseeable that a Jesuit would become pope. "

This means that Bergoglio  is not a pope because by oath he has an impediment by the same order of the Jesuits. 

In Mexican TV interview Bergoglio  talking about his invalid election said: "And next, I do not know what happened," he continues. "They made me stand up. They asked me if I agreed. I said yes.  I do not know if they made me swear something, I do not know do not remember."

Catechism of Saint Pius X

Q. What sin does he commit who swears falsely?
A. He who swears falsely commits a mortal sin, because he grievously dishonours God, the Infinite Truth, by calling Him to witness what is false.

 Q. What does the Second Commandment command us to do?
A. The Second Commandment commands us to honour the Holy Name of God as well as to keep our oaths and vows.

Coming out at Georgetown University.

Heretical Jesuits of Georgetown University, corrupt youth, pushing the acceptance of the vice of homosexuality.

  

 

Gloria.TV News on the 14th of October 2016

Coming Out as a Heretic: Georgetown University, America’s oldest Catholic college, is sponsoring a, “Coming Out Day” celebration during the entire month of October, leading students to embrace same-sex confusion. The listed partners for the events include Georgetown’s Campus Ministry and Department of Theology. None of the event descriptions include mention of Catholic teaching on human sexuality and chastity.

 

'OUTober':

The officially recognized and endorsed "LGBTQ Resource Center" at Georgetown University has organized a full-month of pro-homosexual activities on campus during the entire month of October.

 Cardinal Donald Wuerl
Archdiocese of Washington Pastoral Center
PO Box 29260
Washington, DC 20017-0260

Phone: 301-853-4500
E-mail: digitalmedia@adw.org

Write to the president of Georgetown University, Dr. John J. DeGioia:
204 Healy Hall
37th & "O" Streets, NW
Washington, DC 20057-1789
Phone: (202) 687-4134
E-mail: help@georgetown.edu

Radical liberal Donald Wuerl is allowing this to happen with full knowledge and malice, take a look: Here and here.

 

 

Diocese of Rome’s new guidelines allow sacrilege Communion for sexually active cohabitating couples case by case.

New guidelines about the interpretation of Amoris Laetitia issued for Bergoglio’s own diocese of Rome suggest that couples living in a state the Church labels objectively sinful may in limited circumstances receive sacrilege communion in a ‘discreet manner’.

 

ROME, October 5, 2016 (LifeSiteNews)

«The vicar of the Diocese of Rome, Cardinal Agostino Vallini, publicized the official diocesan guidelines for the implementation of Amoris Laetitia last month. Pope Francis is the bishop of the Diocese of Rome. According to veteran Vatican journalist Sandro Magister, “it is unthinkable that the cardinal vicar…made these guidelines official without the supreme proprietor of the diocese having first read and approved them.”

Bergoglio is punishing and persecuting Catholics for Confronting his heresies.

The apostate Bergoglio worship the Koran which denies the Holy Trinity

  The Qur'an denies the Holy Trinity, the divinity of Christ, the incarnation, the crucifixion, the resurrection and our redemption.  

Refutes the Holy Trinity:

 ·Surah 4:171

“...and do not say: (Allah is a) trinity. Give up this assertion; it would be better for you. Allah is indeed just one God. Far be it from His glory that He should have a son...

“They [22] do blaspheme who say: ‘Allah is one of three in a Trinity’: for there is no god except One Allah. If they do not desist from their word (of blasphemy), verily a grievous penalty will befall the blasphemers among them.” (Surah 5:73)

·“They do blaspheme who say: ‘Allah is Christ the son of Mary.’” (Surah 5:72)

·“In blasphemy indeed are those who say that Allah is Christ the son of Mary.” (Surah 5:17) ·“Christ the son of Mary was no more than a messenger.” (Surah 5:75)

 

Matthew 4:9-10

and he said to him, "All these I shall give to you, if you will prostrate yourself and worship me."

At this, Jesus said to him, "Get away, Satan! It is written: 'The Lord, your God, shall you worship and him alone shall you serve.'"

Pseudo-Chrysostom: Observe how Christ when Himself suffered wrong at the hands of the Devil, being tempted of him, saying, “If thou be the Son of God, cast thyself down,” yet was not moved to chide the Devil. But now when the Devil usurps the honour of God, he is wroth, and drives him away, saying, “Go thy way, Satan;” that we may learn by His example to bear injuries to ourselves with magnanimity, but wrongs to God, to endure not so much as to hear; for to be patient under our own wrongs is praiseworthy, to dissemble when God is wronged is impiety. (Catena Aurea - St. Thomas Aquinas)

On June 29, 2010 Bergoglio visited an Islamic center and said:“I came as a brother to strengthen ties”

August 2, 2005 Bergoglio prayed before dead body of the Muslim president of the Islamic Center of Argentina.    The body was placed east toward Mecca.  The Islamic imam recited verses from the Koran and asked for blessings from Muhammad. Bergoglio said:

“With my prayer I ask the creator, the most merciful to repay him for all the good he did”.

St. Thomas Aquinas taught:

“If anyone were to worship at the tomb of Muhammad, he would be deemed an apostate”.

Francis, June 6, 2015, Address at the John Paul II Youth Center: “Muslims, Jews, Orthodox, Catholics and others. We are all brothers and sisters! We all adore the One God!  Never ever let there be separation among you. Brotherhood and union.”

– The prayers and customs of the Muslims are not pleasing to God

Council of Vienne (Ecumenical XV)

The public invocation of the sacrilegious name of Mahomet is expressly forbidden – it displeases the divine majesty

It is an insult to the holy name and a disgrace to the Christian faith that in certain parts of the world subject to Christian princes where Saracens live, sometimes apart, sometimes intermingled with Christians, the Saracen priests commonly called Zabazala, in their temples or mosques, in which the Saracens meet to adore the infidel Mahomet, loudly invoke and extol his name each day at certain hours from a high place, in the hearing of both Christians and Saracens and there make public declarations in his honour. There is a place, moreover, where once was buried a certain Saracen whom other Saracens venerate as a saint. A great number of Saracens flock there quite openly from far and near. This brings disrepute on our faith and gives great scandal to the faithful. These practices cannot be tolerated any further without displeasing the divine majesty. We therefore, with the sacred council’s approval, strictly forbid such practices henceforth in Christian lands. […] [We enjoin on catholic princes] They are to remove this offence altogether from their territories and take care that their subjects remove it, so that they may thereby attain the reward of eternal happiness. They are to forbid expressly the public invocation of the sacrilegious name of Mahomet. (Council of Vienne. Decree, no. 25, January 13, 1313) 


Lateran Council V (Ecumenical XVIII)

The Muslims treat the Cross and Salvation with complete contempt

[…] the Turks and other infidels […] They treat the way of true light and salvation with complete contempt and totally unyielding blindness; they attack the life-giving cross on which our Saviour willed to accept death so that by dying he might destroy death, and by the ineffable mystery of his most holy life he might restore life; and they make themselves hateful enemies of God and most bitter persecutors of the Christian religion. Strengthened by defences not only spiritual but also temporal, we may be able, under God’s guidance and favour, to oppose the bitter and frequent sallies by which, in wild rage, they move savagely amidst Christian blood. (Lateran Council V. Session XII, March 16, 1517) 


Saint Juan de Ribera

Islam does not deserve the name of religion

But that which has already been written is sufficient as the conclusion of this article, which is so important for your salvation; which is to say, for the destruction of the perverse sect ofMohammed. Because if we have proven that the finality that it proposes is entirely bestial, and unworthy of the authority of man; and if its author was an adulterous man, a perjurer, a thief, a murderer, a blasphemer, and most ignorant in human and divine letters; and if all the things contained in this his law were fables in philosophy and errors in theology, even for those who do not possess the light of reason, and the customs he teaches are a school of bestial vices; and he did not prove this his new sect with any motive, neither supernatural with miracles nor natural with reasons, but solely spread it by the force of arms, violence, fictions, lies, and carnal license, what remains other than it is a sect that is impious, blasphemous and vicious, an invention of the devil, and the direct way to the fires of hell, and that it does not even merit the name of being called a religion. (Saint John de Ribera. Catechism for the Instruction of the New Converts of the Moors, 1599 AD) 

Saint Thomas Aquinas

• There is not one pronouncement on the part of the prophets offering Mohammed any witness

Nor do divine pronouncements on the part of preceding prophets offer him (Mohammed) any witness. On the contrary, he perverts almost all the testimonies of the Old and New Testaments by making them into fabrications of his own, as can be. seen by anyone who examines his law. It was, therefore, a shrewd decision on his part to forbid his followers to read the Old and New Testaments, lest these books convict him of falsity. It is thus clear that those who place any faith in his words believe foolishly. (Saint Thomas Aquinas. Summa contra Gentiles, Book I, ch. 6, no. 4)

In the Treatise on True Devotion to the Blessed Virgin, St. Louis de Montfort teaches us that the Virgin Mary will lead us in the fight against Satan, to battle against the army of the Antichrist; formed by heretics, apostates, wicked, idolaters and Mohammedans. Saint Louis adds that in these latter times, the Blessed Virgin will raise up great saints, who will extend the empire of Jesus Christ over "the impious, the idolaters and the Muslims."

Our Lady of Rosary, Pray for Us.