"IT IS A GRAVE OFFENSE NOT TO WORK FOR THE EXTERMINATION OF HERESY WHEN THIS MONSTROUS INFECTION REQUIRES ACTION"
— Council of Vienne ♰♰♰


Saturday, January 22, 2022

Prayer to Saint John Bosco

 

O glorious Saint John Bosco, who, in order to lead young people to the feet of the divine Master and to form them in the light of faith and Christian morality, didst heroically sacrifice thyself to the very end of thy life and didst found a fitting religious Institute destined to endure and to bring to the farthest boundaries of the earth thy glorious work, obtain also for us from our Lord a holy love for young people, who are exposed to so many seductions, in order that we may generously spend ourselves in supporting them against the snares of the devil, in keeping them safe from the dangers of the world, and in guiding them, pure and holy, in the path that leads to God. Amen



(Indulgence of 300 days)






St. John Bosco's Novena to Our Lady Help of Christians Against the Enemies of God

 



To obtain a favor, St. Don Bosco generally advised a Novena to Our Lady Help of Christians. He had a singular devotion to the Hail Holy Queen and advised some work of charity as thanksgiving for graces obtained.


O Mary, powerful Virgin, thou art the mighty and glorious protector of holy Church; thou art the marvelous help of Christians; thou art terrible as an army in battle array; thou alone hast destroyed every heresy in the whole world. In the midst of our anguish, our struggles and our distress defend us from the power of the enemy and at the hour of our death receive our souls in paradise. Amen.


Here mention your Petitions

Say Our Father, Hail Mary, Glory be to the Father, three times

Hail, Holy Queen, Mother of Mercy, our Life, our Sweetness, and our Hope. To Thee do we cry, poor banished children of Eve. To Thee do we send up our sighs mourning and weeping in this valley of tears. Turn then, most gracious Advocate, Thine Eyes of Mercy toward us, and after this our exile show unto us the Blessed Fruit of thy Womb, Jesus. O clement, O loving, O sweet Virgin Mary. Pray for us O Holy Mother of God. That we may be made worthy of the promises of Christ.

Thursday, January 20, 2022

HomoHeresy Oozes From Bergoglian Heresies

 The American Catholic

 Guy McClung

If the reigning mathematicians at the best universities assert that 2+2=5, and the best scientists in the world propose that ice is now heavier than water, then all sorts of further untruths will, logically and inevitably, follow.  Other mathematicians will proclaim 2+2+2+2+2=15, and other scientists will propose the theory that the polar ice caps will sink.

And thus it is with the new heresies that have already been announced, and more that will inevitably follow as the evil spawn of the Bergolgian heresies. This now includes the homoheresy.



Bergoglianism Heresies

As are so many infernal heresies through history, Bergolgianism is named after its author, Jorge Bergoglio. A substantial number of the heresies included in Bergoglianism are based on the core principles of his exhortation, Amoris Laetitia. These include:  1. There is no mortal sin,  i.e. no sin so grievous that when the sinner is unrepentant results in the eternal loss of sanctifying grace; 2. This is true even for those aware of the demands of the divine law; 3. Divine grace does not make all mortal sins avoidable; 4. A situation’s circumstances can dismiss one from the demands of the divine law; 5. Depending on the situation and its circumstances, God sometimes wills a person to sin; and 6. For those God judges and who are then sent to hell, hell is not eternal, the fire is not everlasting; and no one is condemned forever. [see, in addition to the numerous verbatim quotations from public statements of Jorge Bergoglio, these sections of his exhortation Amoris Laetitia– 296, 297, 300-303, and 305]. Implicit in the proclamations of Bergolgianism is that God the Father, Jesus Christ and the Holy Spirit made mistakes, errors corrected by Jorge Bergoglio.





The HomoHeresy- No surprise!

The homoheresy is this: In certain situations men and women can voluntarally and intentionally engage in homosexual actions and not only are these actions not sinful, they are acts of loving virtue.  In these situations, this is God’s will for them.  Fully aware of what they are doing, they may continue in their sin, even publically, and be admitted to all the sacraments of the church.  God made them this way. No matter what the situation or circumstances, none of these people will ever be condemned forever for engaging in these actions. “These people” can include married people who and ordained priests, bishops, and cardinals.

Clearly,  Bergoglianism is the evil parent of this heresy. Recent declarations of the homoheresy by Vatican officials and by bishops in several countries make it clear that this heresy is one specific restatement of the Bergoglian heresies.



The Vatican

Very recently, the Pontifical Biblical Commission has published a book entitled What Is Man? An Itinerary of Biblical Anthropology. In this book, the church’s true teaching on homosexual actions is given minimal voice while the text concentrates on denigrations of established church teachings which cast them  as  “archaic”, “historically conditioned”, “outdated”,  and deficient for not evidencing a “new and more adequate understanding of the human person.”

There is little or no reference to scholars and works well-grounded in current and accepted scientific knowledge and philosophical discussion that are in accord with church teaching and contrary to the presentation of the homoheresy.  In terms of church doctrine, tradition, and teaching, this book gives a platform to serious and widespread errors, but there is no explicit condemnation of them.

Germany-Again

Some German bishops have also recently proclaimed the homoheresy.  The chairman of the Marriage and Family Commission of the German bishops’ conference has already publicized the fact  that the German bishops agree and now teach as shepherds of the faithful that homosexuality is a “normal form” of human sexual identity.

These bishops have announced an upcoming study of this topic: “The Sexuality of Man – How should one discuss it scientifically-theologically and judge it ecclesiastically?” One news agency reported that their aim is  “Newly Assessing’ Catholic Doctrine on Homosexuality.” It is clear that the conclusions to be reached at the end of the German hierarchy’s two-year “Synodal Process” for addressing such issues have already been written.

Both the Vatican and the German bishops are proclaiming the homoheresy, weaseling it into the public discourse under the cover of what they allege current science establishes about a better and more sufficient understanding of the human person. The homoheretics conclude that this correct scientific understanding demands a required correction of the view that God values only heterosexual unions; and that true doctrine, as they have discovered it and as God most surely intended from the time of Adam and Eve, includes the irrefutable and intrinsic value of homosexual unions and the dogmatic acceptance of homosexuality as a worthy expression of what God intended about what it means to be human. 

There is no doubt that the homoheresy finds its foundations in the Bergoglian hersises.  German Archbishop Koch has declared that these “developments” of doctrine regarding their discoveries of God’s will have been made possible and energized by the teachings of Amoris Laetitia. Declaring that previous church teaching is not “up to date,” German bishops have stated that  homosexuality is one of the “normal forms of sexual predisposition,” that homosexuality is “not changeable” through socialization, “nor does it have to be changed.”

The Bible

The inspired words of God in both the Old and New Testaments explicitly contradict the homoheresy. Below are several excerpts which make this clear. 

Leviticus 18:22:  “You shall not lie with a male as one lies with a female; it is an abomination.”

Romans 1:26-27:  “For this reason God gave them over to degrading passions; for their women exchanged the natural function for that which is unnatural, and in the same way also the men abandoned the natural function of the woman and burned in their lust toward one another, men with men committing indecent acts and receiving in their own persons the due penalty of their perversity.”

1 Corinthians 6:9-11: “Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God.”

1 Timothy 1:9-10:  “ . . . understanding this, that the law is not laid down for the just but for the lawless and disobedient, for the ungodly and sinners, for the unholy and profane, for those who strike their fathers and mothers, for murderers, the sexually immoral, men who practice homosexuality, kidnapers, liars, perjurers . . . ”

Jude 1:7:  “Likewise, Sodom, Gomorrah, and the surrounding towns, which, in the same manner as they, indulged in sexual promiscuity and practiced unnatural vice, serve as an example by undergoing a punishment of eternal fire.”

Catechism of the Catholic Church

The catechism, in a section entitled “Chastity and homosexuality” directly contradicts the homoheresy.

“2357 Homosexuality refers to relations between men or between women who experience an exclusive or predominant sexual attraction toward persons of the same sex. . . . Basing itself on Sacred Scripture, which presents homosexual acts as acts of grave depravity, tradition has always declared that “homosexual acts are intrinsically disordered.”  They are contrary to the natural law . . . Under no circumstances can they be approved.”

“2358  . . .  This inclination, which is objectively disordered, . . . ”

“2396 Among the sins gravely contrary to chastity are masturbation, fornication, pornography, and homosexual practices.”

Church Fathers

In the early church, men known as the Church Fathers wrote about Holy Scripturem church teaching and tradition. Many of their works directly contradict today’s homoheresy. Below are several excerpts of their works.

Athenagoras:   “But though such is our character (Oh! why should I speak of things unfit to be uttered?), the things said of us are an example of the proverb, ‘The harlot reproves the chaste.’ For those who have set up a market for fornication and established infamous resorts for the young for every kind of vile pleasure – who do not abstain even from males, males with males committing shocking abominations, outraging all the noblest and comeliest bodies in all sorts of ways, so dishonoring the fair workmanship of God.”

Eusebius of Caesarea:  “[God in the Law given to Moses] having forbidden all unlawful marriage, and all unseemly practice, and the union of women with women and men with men.”

Saint John Chrysostom:  “But if thou scoffest at hearing of hell and believest not that fire, remember Sodom. . .  For such is the burning of Sodom, and that conflagration! . . Consider how great is that sin, to have forced hell to appear even before its time! . . . For that rain was unwonted, for the intercourse was contrary to nature, and it deluged the land, since lust had done so with their souls.  . . . For such was also the intercourse of the men, making a body of this sort more worthless than the very land of Sodom. And what is there more detestable than a man who hath pandered himself, or what more execrable? “

Saint Augustine:  “Those offences which be contrary to nature are everywhere and at all times to be held in detestation and punished; such were those of the Sodomites, which should all nations commit, they should all be held guilty of the same crime by the divine law, which hath not so made men that they should in that way abuse one another. For even that fellowship which should be between God and us is violated, when that same nature of which He is author is polluted by the perversity of lust.”

Saint Gregory the Great:  “Sacred Scripture itself confirms that sulfur evokes the stench of the flesh, as it speaks of the rain of fire and sulfur poured upon Sodom by the Lord. He had decided to punish Sodom for the crimes of the flesh, and the very type of punishment he chose emphasized the shame of that crime. For sulfur stinks, and fire burns. So it was just that Sodomites, burning with perverse desires arising from the flesh like stench, should perish by fire and sulfur so that through this just punishment they would realize the evil they had committed, led by a perverse desire.”

Saints, Theologians and Scholars

Numerous saints, theologians, philosophers, and scholars over the centuries have explicitly denounced the homoheresy. Quotations from the work of a few of them are below.

Saint Peter Damian:  “Truly, this vice is never to be compared with any other vice because it surpasses the enormity of all vices.… It defiles everything, stains everything, pollutes everything. And as for itself, it permits nothing pure, nothing clean, nothing other than filth . . . The miserable flesh burns with the heat of lust; the cold mind trembles with the rancor of suspicion; and in the heart of the miserable man chaos boils like Tartarus [Hell . . .This plague undermines the foundation of faith, weakens the strength of hope, destroys the bond of charity; it takes away justice, subverts fortitude, banishes temperance, blunts the keenness of prudence.”

Saint Thomas Aquinas:  “If all the sins of the flesh are worthy of condemnation because by them man allows himself to be dominated by that which he has of the animal nature, much more deserving of condemnation are the sins against nature by which man degrades his own animal nature….”

Saint Catherine of Siena:  “But they act in a contrary way, for they come full of impurity to this mystery, and not only of that impurity to which, through the fragility of your weak nature, you are all naturally inclined (although reason, when free will permits, can quiet the rebellion of nature), but these wretches not only do not bridle this fragility, but do worse, committing that accursed sin against nature, and as blind and fools, with the light of their intellect darkened, they do not know the stench and misery in which they are. It is not only that this sin stinks before me, who am the Supreme and Eternal Truth, it does indeed displease me so much and I hold it in such abomination that for it alone I buried five cities by a divine judgment, my divine justice being no longer able to endure it. This sin not only displeases me as I have said, but also the devils whom these wretches have made their masters. Not that the evil displeases them because they like anything good, but because their nature was originally angelic, and their angelic nature causes them to loathe the sight of the actual commission of this enormous sin.”

Saint Bernardine of Siena:  “No sin in the world grips the soul as the accursed sodomy; this sin has always been detested by all those who live according to God.… Deviant passion is close to madness; this vice disturbs the intellect, destroys elevation and generosity of soul, brings the mind down from great thoughts to the lowliest, makes the person slothful, irascible, obstinate and obdurate, servile and soft and incapable of anything; furthermore, agitated by an insatiable craving for pleasure, the person follows not reason but frenzy.… Just as people participate in the glory of God in different degrees, so also in hell some suffer more than others. He who lived with this vice of sodomy suffers more than another, for this is the greatest sin.”

Saint Peter Canisius:  “As the Sacred Scripture says, the Sodomites were wicked and exceedingly sinful. Saint Peter and Saint Paul condemn this nefarious and depraved sin. In fact, the Scripture denounces this enormous indecency thus: ‘The scandal of Sodomites and Gomorrhans has multiplied and their sins have become grave beyond measure.’ So the angels said to just Lot, who totally abhorred the depravity of the Sodomites: ‘Let us leave this city….’ Holy Scripture does not fail to mention the causes that led the Sodomites, and can also lead others, to this most grievous sin. . . . Those unashamed of violating divine and natural law are slaves of this never sufficiently execrated depravity.”

Why ?

Why would anyone, let alone a bishop of the church, proclaim and be an advocate for the homoheresy? Two answers come to mind.

Church Powers and Princes are Homosexualist

Many of those ordained to Holy Orders who now rule in the earthly power structures of Jesus’s church are  thoroughly homosexualized. They are known publicly as the “lavender mafia.” It includes thousands of ordained homocriminals, including sodorapists, pederasts, homopredators, and perverts, who have had tens of thousands of victims worldwide. It also includes those pastors, bishops, archbishops and cardinals who have enabled these ordained homocriminals and who have, for decades, shuttled them from parish to parish, diocese to diocese, and country to country – with the full and certain knowledge that the homocriminals would again commit their crimes.  Some of these same ordained and consecrated men have authorized the payment by the church of billions of dollars to settle claims by their victims – billions of dollars of the money given by  the faithful.

Of course such men would cum laetitia accept and promulgate the homoheresy.

Doctrinal Dominoes Fall – One, Then All

Jesus is the way, the truth, and the life. The Bergoglians reject this. They are pursuing a path that appears to be based on this scheme: If one, only one, of the truths proclaimed by Jesus’s church is shown to be false, then Jesus’s church is destroyed, and the heretical new church will endure.

A fifth century Church Father, Vincent of Lerins, warned about this demonic plan:

For if once this license of impious fraud be admitted, I dread to say in how great danger religion will be of being utterly destroyed and annihilated. For if any one part of Catholic truth be given up, another, and another, and another will thenceforward be given up as a matter of course, and the several individual portions having been rejected, what will follow in the end but the rejection of the whole? On the other hand, if what is new begins to be mingled with what is old, foreign with domestic, profane with sacred, the custom will of necessity creep on universally, till at last the Church will have nothing left untampered with, nothing unadulterated, nothing sound, nothing pure; but where formerly there was a sanctuary of chaste and undefiled truth, thenceforward there will be a brothel of impious and base errors. May God’s mercy avert this wickedness from the minds of his servants; be it rather the frenzy of the ungodly.


diario7-archivos: EN LA PUERTA DEL TRIDUO SAGRADO, BERGOGLIO DECLARA QUE NO  HAY INFIERNO 





 

The homoheretics have tried to open wide the gates of hell to the unsuspecting faithful, not knowing that they will, if unrepentant, pass through the gates themselves.  No matter what someone wearing papal white may exhort or proclaim, the homoheresy is and will be heresy.

Wednesday, January 19, 2022

Bergoglio has sold the Church to the Chinese Communist Party

BERGOGLIO’S RABBIT HOLE

How deep does it go?

by William Mahoney, Ph.D.  •  ChurchMilitant.com  •  January 19, 2022    



TRANSCRIPT


CLICK TO WATCH THE VIDEO

Church Militant 

Following up on last night's bombshell report on Vatican-China financial ties, ties in the billions of dollars, questions abound regarding how far back this goes and whether it was planned for even more sinister purposes than initially thought. Large sums of money reportedly flooding from the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to the Vatican, coupled with Francis' incessant pushing of the jab, raise many red flags. Church Militant's William Mahoney explores some of the unknowns in this unfolding scandal. 

Whistleblower Abp. Carlo Maria Viganò never understood why disgraced homosexual pederast Theodore McCarrick was rehabilitated and sent to China at the start of Francis' pontificate in 2013.





McCarrick brokered the clandestine deal between the Holy See and the CCP, which China's Cdl. Joseph Zen never understood, as it led to such disastrous consequences.

Cdl. Joseph Zen: "They have sold our Church completely."

In 2020, Church Militant reported on the Vatican-China sellout, spotlighting another whistleblower who exposed the China-Vatican payout.

An expert in geopolitical economics, Dr. Francesco Galietti asserted the CCP has been sending $2 billion to the Vatican every year since Francis became pope in 2013. Much of what Galietti revealed came on the heels of similar revelations by exiled Chinese billionaire Guo Wengui.

With the Vatican-China accord, CCP money apparently hitting Vatican coffers and now Francis manipulating Catholic teaching to push the so-called vaccine, one wonders if this was the plan all along. Francis' secret talks with Pfizer plutocrat Dr. Albert Bourla only add intrigue to this question.

Jules Gomes: "The Vatican did not disclose these meetings, which means they were very clandestine. If the Vatican has been paid to push the Pfizer vaccine — they exclusively administer the Pfizer jab in the Vatican, and every employee is forced — compelled — to take this vaccine."

The pontiff has also met with fake Catholics Joe Biden and Nancy Pelosi, who likewise relentlessly push the jab.

Was Francis just a fluke papal election the CCP found easy to control, or was the St. Gallen Mafia instrumental in appropriating the papal throne with their man?

Julia Meloni, author, The St. Gallen Mafia: "In 2012, Kasper — Cdl. Walter Kasper of the group — was talking about a southerly wind blowing, and people would see this as a reference later to Bergoglio."

McCarrick received communist training in St. Gallen, Switzerland, even before his seminary days in the immediate aftermath of World War II, perhaps making his quick rehabilitation under Francis less mysterious.

Another troubling connection exists between Francis and Aleteia, a Catholic "fact-checking" website bankrolled by George Soros and the king of jab-pushingBill Gates.

When Viganò dropped his first round of revelations on corruption in the hierarchy, the pope's right-hand American prelate was quick to deflect.





Cdl. Blase Cupich: "The pope has a bigger agenda; he's got to get on with other things of talking about the environment and protecting migrants and carrying on the work of the Church. We're not going to go down a rabbit hole on this."





Marcelo Sorondo Believes China Is "Best Implementer" Of Catholic Social Doctrine


It's not surprising Francis and his gang don't want anybody going down a rabbit hole, as it seems to go through the earth, from Rome to Beijing.






Monday, January 17, 2022

Nephew of late Argentine cardinal accuses Bergoglio of covering up homosexual abuse

 





BUENOS AIRES, Argentina (LifeSiteNews) – The nephew of Pope Francis’ predecessor as archbishop of Buenos Aires accused the pope of covering up homosexual clerical abuse in a recent interview and blasted Francis for the leadership style “of a despot.”

Speaking with Gloria.tv, Dr. José Arturo Quarracino, a teacher and nephew of the late Cardinal Antonio Quarracino, said that Francis protected homosexual priests for years after succeeding his uncle, who led the archdiocese of Buenos Aires from 1990 to his death in 1998.

Dr. Quarracino said that he ran in the same circles as the future pope, Fr. Jorge Mario Bergoglio, while the Argentine Jesuit served as provincial superior of the Society of Jesus in the 1970s.

“From 1995 to 2002, I worked in Bergoglio’s environment,” Quarracino added. “He was chancellor of the Universidad del Salvador, where I worked.”

At the time, Bergoglio, who was appointed archbishop in 1998, “maintained a very Jesuit profile, very pious, very pastoral,” according to Quarracino.

But he affirmed to Gloria.tv that Archbishop Bergoglio repeatedly covered up sexual abuse and misconduct “because this often concerned people who were close to him.”



“The case of a priest whom he trusted very much and who was known for his homosexual tendencies was much talked about,” Quarracino said. “Bergoglio ‘helped’ him by sending him to Rome a few years before he became Pope, among other things because this allowed him to learn a lot of confidential information from the Holy See.”


The homosexual Pedacchio spy and Bergoglio's accomplice



“One must not forget that these kinds of personalities tend to gather information of all kinds, information in which Bergoglio was interested.”

Quarracino also recalled that a civil servant “very close” to Bergoglio continued working at the University del Salvador even after the archbishop was informed that the man distributed pornography to university members.

“In April 2001, a few months after his elevation to Cardinal, an employee of the Universidad del Salvador, of which he was Grand Chancellor, informed him that a person very close to Bergoglio, who not only worked in this house of studies but was also a civil servant, had distributed pornographic photos to members of the university for fun,” Quarracino related. “This person was able to continue working for several years without any problems, while the person who had brought this to Bergoglio’s attention was dismissed without cause a few months later.”

But there were “known cases of priests who displayed such behavior and could always rely on Bergoglio’s discreet protection,” he said. “He only started doing this openly when he got to the Chair of Peter, for example, when he gave refuge and political and ecclesiastical protection to someone like Bishop Zanchetta.”

Former Argentine Bishop Gustavo Zanchetta, an early appointee of Pope Francis, was charged in 2019 with sexually abusing two seminarians.

After Zanchetta’s resignation two years before, the pope created a position specially for him at a Vatican agency that oversees the Holy See’s assets and real estate holdings. Pope Francis’ relationship with Zanchetta sparked outrage in 2019 when it was revealed that the Vatican had been notified as early as 2015 about allegations that the bishop attacked seminarians.

The pope has faced criticism for his handling of several homosexual abuser priests as archbishop of Buenos Aires, as well.

Throughout his career, Bergoglio deliberately chose scandal-ridden collaborators “at all levels,” Quarracino said, “apart from the fact that he has always surrounded himself with mediocre, submissive, and servile personalities.”

“Bergoglio’s leadership style is that of a despot who allows neither contradiction nor independent judgment.”

Bergoglio ‘changed his approach’ in Buenos Aires

Quarracino also discussed how Bergoglio, who had cultivated the appearance of piety and orthodoxy, “changed his approach completely” after his elevation as archbishop of Buenos Aires.

“He began by distancing himself from everyone he did not know and who did not belong to his circle of friends, and was known for the fact that no one knew what he really thought, as he always told every interlocutor what he wanted to hear,” Quarracino said.

“First, he got rid of my uncle’s most important collaborators, like Monsignor José Erro, the rector of the Buenos Aires Cathedral, a saintly priest, whom he told by phone to resign and retire without consideration, without thanks,” he noted. “I think he did this to show the clergy of Buenos Aires that the leadership of the Archdiocese was going to change radically. He swept away everything that suggested continuity with the preceding period, even if he was careful to preserve something of my uncle’s legacy.”

Bergoglio’s heterodoxy wasn’t immediately apparent after his appointment, but became clear within a year and a half, according to Quarracino. “But as time went on, he began to show signs of a certain ‘slackness,’ not so much in what he said but in what he did.”

In December 1999, for example, Bergoglio ordered the archdiocese to celebrate a “Mass of the Millennium,” at odds with upcoming Jubilee Year proclaimed by Pope St. John Paul II and celebrated by the universal Church. “I believe he did this to show the ‘world of the powerful’ that he was independent enough to act independently of the universal Church, while respecting the form,” said Quarracino.

Bergoglio’s career had long been marked by conflict. At the time that Cardinal Quarracino pushed to have him named auxiliary bishop of Buenos Aires in the early 1990s, the Jesuits had “banished” the former provincial to Córdoba “to keep him away from Buenos Aires.” “The end of his term was marked by great internal divisions between his friends and opponents,” Quarracino told Gloria.tv.

The promotion “solved Bergoglio’s big problem, namely the enormous conflict he had with many Jesuits who had been his friends and from whom he had distanced himself,” Quarracino said. But as auxiliary bishop, he added, Bergoglio could still be “harsh, even cruel.”

“Auxiliary Bishop Bergoglio knew how to win the esteem of a large part of the young clergy with his simplicity, piety, caring and psychological guidance, which he exercised like no other – often for the better, in some cases for the worse. Towards those who fell out of favor with him, he was often harsh, even cruel. He subtly sidelined the older clergy to promote his friends and young protégés,” Quarracino attested.

Argentinian Academic Reveals Bergoglio' Veiled Past in Explosive Interview

The Magisterium of the Catholic Church has declared invalid and null the elevation to the papacy
 of any cardinal or bishop who has deviated from the faith.


Cdl. Bergoglio Protected Homosexual Bishop in Argentina


                                   


Bergoglio protects homosexual predators and their concealers







BERGOGLIO´S HERETICAL PAST IS FRANCIS PRESENT.

Pope Pius IV (1499-1565)

"We declare that if ever it should appear that any bishop, even one acting as an Archbishop, Patriarch, or Primate, or a Cardinal of the Roman Church, or a legate, or even the Roman Pontiff, whether prior to his promotion to Cardinal, or prior to his election as Roman Pontiff, has beforehand deviated from the Catholic Faith or fallen into any heresy, we enact, we decree, we determine, we define: Such promotion or election in and of itself, even with the agreement and unanimous consent of all the Cardinals, shall be null, legally invalid, and void. It shall not be possible for such a promotion or election to be deemed valid or to be valid, neither through reception of office, consecration, subsequent administration, or possession, not even through the putative enthronement of a Roman Pontiff himself, together with the veneration and obedience accorded him by all. Such promotion or election shall not through any lapse of time in the foregoing situation be considered even partially legitimate in any way. Each and all of the words, as acts, laws, appointments of those so promoted or elected -- and indeed, whatsoever flows there from -- shall be lacking in force, and shall grant no stability and legal power to anyone whatsoever. Those so promoted or elected, by that very fact and without the need to make any further declaration, shall be deprived of any dignity, position, honor, title, authority, office, and power. Therefore, it is permitted to no one to impair this page of Our approval, renewal, sanction, statute, wills of repeal, of decrees, or to go contrary to it by a rash daring deed. If anyone, moreover, will have presumed to attempt this, he will incur the wrath of Almighty God and of the blessed Apostles Peter and Paul." -Pope Paul IV (1555-1559), Bull "Cum ex Apostolatus Officio," February 16, 1559, sec. 9


Friday, January 14, 2022

Apostasy: Bergoglio is using the Papacy to promote the vice of sodomy

 

Bergoglio in Argentina was already a gay activist, where he had already deviated from the Catholic faith by defying the Laws of God and the moral teachings of the Catholic Church. 

Matthew 24:11

 And many false prophets will arise and lead many astray.


Bergoglio acts as a false prophet posing as the Spokesman of God or Vicar of Christ, who arrogantly speaks in the name of God not to confirm the Catholic Faith but to contradict the Natural Law given by God, his Commandments and the immutable teachings of the Catholic Church. 

FIRST ‘GAY’ POPE

Lovin' the gay. 

Church Militant January 13, 2022




Back in the 1990s when Bill Clinton was in the White House, they used to call him America's first Black president. 

It was a reference to his policies, which liberals said were so good for Black Americans that it was like Bill was Black. That was a lie, of course. No Democratic policies are ever good for Blacks. It was all political smoke and mirrors. 

However, the terminology works in relation to what going on in Rome right now when it comes to homosexuals. Following the same pattern, Francis is the Church's first gay pope. He is certainly the first pope in history to not only first use the word gay but to throw it around nonstop. 

There's something deeply wrong with a religious institution, especially the only one founded by the Son of God, especially this one, to be so welcoming to sodomy. LGBT is all about self-identifying by a perverted sexual act or acts. Period. These acts are immoral, evil and intrinsically disordered. They go against nature; they go against God. 

They certainly aren't the only sexual acts or relationships that do, but they seem to be on the papal radar, as well as his advisors', with an eerie frequency.

In fact, he never shuts up about them.

If you tabulated the number of times the pope has talked about fornication, cohabitation, masturbation, pornography, adultery and so forth, all of them combined could not hold a candle to his nonstop yammering on about gay stuff. He is nonstop praising people in the Church pushing for more gay sex. He celebrates them publicly, sends them private letters (which become public), gives them awards, private audiences. 

They deny the Church's moral teaching, its doctrine.GabTweet

He has created a victim class in the Church by constantly repeating the LGBT propaganda, and then he has elevated that victim class to near sainthood.

The news came out last month that he had sent a personal letter (not the first time he has done such a thing in this area) to Sr. Jeannine Gramick, extolling her work. He called her a "valiant woman" who had suffered much for her ministry. The pope needs to get his moral radar much better finely tuned.







Gramick, whose work has previously been condemned not just by the Vatican, but her own order, her work — let's be perfectly clear here — is to get Catholics to accept that anal sex between men is good and holy. Apparently, she's got the pope accepting that. The pope, you recall, counts Fr. James Martin, lover and promoter of gay sex himself, as a good buddy.

Martin is another heretic just like Gramick. The fact that the current openly gay Vatican won't call them heretics or previous weak-kneed pontificates let them carry on with slaps on their limp wrists does not make them not heretics.

They are. They deny the Church's moral teaching, its doctrine. They twist it and pervert it at every turn and every opportunity, painting it as some kind of human rights issue when it's actually about sin and salvation.



Here's a question for His Holiness: Why should gay men get to participate in anal sex and it be labeled good and holy, and fighting for it is valiant, yet heterosexual couples can't do the same type of thing in their arena? Why can't straight couples contracept or cohabitate or fornicate?






In fact, why is it we never hear anything about these topics from the Francis pontificate? No one around him ever talks about them. No one ever produces literature about them. No fornicating, cohabitating, pornography-using straight couple ever gets a personal letter from the Pope praising them for their valiance and heroism and determination and work with the "marginalized" and so forth.

New Ways Ministry has had an "in" at the Vatican for years now, starting under the tenure of Fr. Thomas Rosica when he was the English-language dude at the Vatican press office, starting almost at the beginning of Francis' pontificate.

 “Pope Francis breaks Catholic traditions whenever he wants because
he is ‘free from disordered attachments.’” The Apostate Thomas Rosica 
explains that the Church has entered a “new phase,” and that “with the advent of this first Jesuit pope, it is openly ruled by an individual rather than by the authority of Scripture alone or even its own dictates of tradition plus Scripture.”

The creepy Rosica (eventually busted for massive amounts of plagiarizing, and lying about his academic credentials) was massively pro-gay, perhaps even gay himself. On his little network in Canada, Salt & Light, he used to routinely promote anything he could in the Church related to the rainbow propaganda.

He was a huge fan of the now-dead Fr. Gregory Baum — an enormous mover and shaker behind the scenes at Vatican II. Rosica had him on his show once and lauded him, calling Baum his hero and mentor and any other accolade that he could think of.

It turned out that Baum was, and had been for decades (going back to his time working at Vatican II), an active homosexual who was trying to undermine the Church's sexual teaching all the way back then. No wonder Rosica loved him so much.

But the link is important to understand because Rosica, in his role at the Vatican press office, is the one who opened the door for New Ways Ministry. Not even an actual media organization, he used to get them passes to sit in the press conferences but, more importantly, he ensured that they got picked to ask questions (and not just single questions, which is rare enough, but follow-up questions).

Of course, the questions weren't really questions as much as they were statements with a question mark at the end — statements that were down with gay sex.

Rosica, for the record, was the same force behind the scenes which, for the first time ever, got a group at World Youth Day in 2011 officially declared "unofficial."

That group was Church Militant.

Likewise, Rosica also was the one who got us and our press credentials canceled at the Vatican press office once he discovered we had slipped through the Vatican paperwork process.

The Church is crawling with gays (and, by that, we mean active homosexuals) who do everything they can, like a swarm of termites, to bring down the structure. These Church leaders, including Pope Francis, have done everything in painting the perverts as some kind of heroes and their work outstanding. Heck, James Martin even once said that there are gay saints in Heaven.

They take what is beautiful and they pervert it.GabTweet

Of course, that slimy priest carefully crafts his words so as to walk right up to the edge of heresy without ever actually stepping over the line — at last with his words. The implications and weight and thrust of his words are far over the line. He knows it, the crowds who gather to hear him know it, his social media fanboys know it and the pope knows it.

When Martin makes a comment like that (gay saints in Heaven), he means men who used to have anal sex with each other (or many others) who were nice and loving and socially acceptable and fought for social justice are in Heaven. He does not mean men (or women) who carried the cross of same-sex attraction and tried their best to live according to the Church's teaching and died in a state of sanctifying grace.

Those people are the ones who should be getting letters from the pope calling them valiant and heroic and so forth — not perverts like Martin and Gramick. And let's be very clear here: Martin and Gramick and that entire gay crowd, including those in robes, are all perverts. They take what is beautiful, ordained by Almighty God, and they pervert it. They twist it to fit their own perverse agenda. That's the very definition of a pervert — one who destroys the good and the innocent and misshapes them.

A number of years back, Church Militant released a Vortex saying Pope Francis should resign owing to violating his own protocols regarding sex abuse cover-up by bishops. He personally sheltered some of them, promoted them and protected them from further publicity. That was in the somewhat-narrow range of actual sex abuse of minors. But now he has become a cheerleader for all things gay — not just in the Church itself but in society as well.

It matters little that he has come out against actual sacramental marriage between two men or two women. What matters is that he has no regard for their souls. That is no place for a pope to be, no matter how much those around him (perverts) celebrate him.

You're an old man, Holiness. A tired, old, increasingly mean, judgmental, pro-gay man. It will not be long before you are standing before God. Repent or resign.

The Church doesn't need a "gay pope."


_________________________________________________

Cardinal Pell: “Communion for the divorced and remarried is for some – very few, certainly not the majority of synod fathers – it’s only the tip of the iceberg, it’s a stalking horse. They want wider changes, recognition of civil unions, recognition of homosexual unions”

St. Paul points out in Romans 1:32 that Sodomites are gay activists who gladly see others committing the deadly vice they themselves practice.


Romans 1:32

They know God’s decree, that those who practice such things deserve to die—yet they not only do them but even applaud others who practice them.

St. Thomas Cajetan, O.P. (1469-1534)
Theologian and Cardinal

He points out that the famous axiom "Ubi Petrus, ibi Ecclesia" (Where the Pope is, there is also the Church) holds true only when the Pope acts and behaves as the Pope, because Peter "is subject to the duties of the Office" otherwise, "neither is the Church in him, nor is he in the Church."



The Language of Gayspeak
by Randy Engel

When I first read your response to Scamparini, I must confess that my attention was not drawn immediately to the Ricca scandal, but rather to the fact that you (FRANCIS ) used the term "gay" or "gay person" no less than five times.

On June 6, 2013, you allegedly made a private comment to the members of the Latin America Confederation of Men and Women Religious affirming the existence of a "gay lobby," inside the Vatican, but the term was later reported with quotes. [2] Such was not the case this time round. I must assume that your unfortunate decision to use the politically correct language of gayspeak was deliberate. In normal times this action might have been overlooked with a wink and a nod, but in wartimes it smells of treason and corruption.

The war of which I speak is the war being waged by faithful Catholics and other civilized men and women across the world against the forces of organized sexual perversion. These are the forces of the enemies of the cross of Christ "whose end" Blessed Paul the Apostle tells us "is destruction, whose God is their belly, and whose glory is in their shame, who mind earthly things." (Epistle. Philip. 3, 17-19). The Homosexual Collective, aka, La Lobby Gay, has long been aware that to control language is to control the way people think since we think in terms of words. The words we speak determine the thoughts we have. It is by controlling language, a form of Pavlovian conditioning, that the Collective seeks to change the dominant shape of reality.

Unlike the word, homosexual, or the more traditional term, sodomite, the word "gay" is used by the Collective and its sympathizers to denote a "consciously united resistance to homophobic and heterosexual deployments of power relations." [3] It is the task of the Homosexual Collective to transform the homosexual or sodomite into a "gay" man, and to define, control and validate "authentic" homosexual identity and behavior and all other aspects of "gay" life.

________________________________________________________________________


3 For this is the will of God, your sanctification: that you abstain from fornication; 4 that each one of you know how to control your own body[b] in holiness and honor, 5 not with lustful passion, like the Gentiles who do not know God; 6 that no one wrong or exploit a brother or sister[c] in this matter, because the Lord is an avenger in all these things, just as we have already told you beforehand and solemnly warned you. 7 For God did not call us to impurity but in holiness. 8 Therefore whoever rejects this rejects not human authority but God, who also gives his Holy Spirit to you.
1 Thessalonians 4