Prevost once again attempts to legitimize Bergoglio's homosexual pamphlet, *Fiducia Supplicans*, which promotes the sacrilegious blessing of the sin of sodomy

 

Malachi 2:2 I will send a curse on you, and I will turn your blessings into a curse.

 

The entirety of the pro-homosexual pamphlet *Fiducia Supplicans*—which permits sacrilegious blessings of unrepentant homosexual concubines—is heretical, sacrilegious, and diabolical, just as Cardinal Müller warned.

Cardinal Müller tells Francis: Blessing homosexual couples is ‘impossible’ and ‘blasphemy’

Cardinals Burke, Müller condemn Pope Francis' support for same-sex 'blessings,' Communion for adulterers - LifeSite

The 'Synodal Way' wants to reverse Catholic teaching on homosexuality. Here's why that's impossible - LifeSite

To insinuate or affirm that God can bless two unrepentant homosexual concubines who cohabit and practice sodomy is a diabolical blasphemy.

Pope Leo XIV affirms informal 'blessing' for homosexual couples and downplays sexual sin - LifeSite

Prevost’s Evasive Response to the Apostate Marx’s Homosexual Pseudo-Blessings: No Sanctions.

                               

        Prevost seeks not the salvation of souls, but their perdition.

1 Timothy 4:1 Now the Spirit manifestly saith, that in the last times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to spirits of error, and doctrines of devils.

 

1 Thessalonians 4:3

 It is the will of God that you should lead a life of sanctity. You must refrain from sexual immorality. 

                   

 

Prevost has not repudiated "the entirety" of the apostate and heretical pamphlets *Amoris Laetitia* and *Fiducia Supplicans*.

 Titus 3:10-11
Douay-Rheims 1899 American Edition

A man that is a heretic, after the first and second admonition, avoid:

Knowing that he, that is such an one, is subverted, and sinneth, being condemned by his own judgment.

Rather, Tucho and Prevost seek to legitimize it by invoking an alleged transgression of the boundaries that the homosexual Tucho—acting in complicity with Bergoglio—had established; this maneuver, in its diabolical cunning, was skillfully contrived to soften the impact of the apostasy.

But homosexual activists—beginning with Tucho, Bergoglio, Prevost, James Martin, and the sacrilegious German apostates—have, in fact, given themselves permission to transgress biblical boundaries and Catholic moral doctrine.

 Archbishop Viganò: Bergoglio’s ‘blessings’ for homosexual couples show he is a ‘servant of Satan’

Leo XIV vows to 'continue' Francis' 'prophetic vision' for the Church - LifeSite

Archbishop Viganò: Fr. Fernández’s Defense of *Fiducia Supplicans* Demonstrates His ‘Manifest Heresy’

The pamphlets *Amoris Laetitia* and *Fiducia Supplicans* consummate a triple sacrilege: on the part of impenitent sinners who engage in the vice of sodomy or in any form of fornication and adultery, as well as on the part of the priest who imparts the sacrilegious blessing.

Let us recall that Prevost had already employed this same diabolical tactic to legitimize the pamphlet—creating the impression that he was defending the boundaries established by Tucho and Bergoglio regarding an alleged abuse of the pro-homosexual pamphlet *Fiducia Supplicans*—a tactic in which he publicly cast doubt upon Catholic teaching concerning sexual morality and the immutability of dogma.

By whom are they blessed, if God does not bless sin?

1 Timothy 5:22: Do not lay hands on anyone hastily, thereby sharing responsibility for the sins of others; keep yourself free from sin.

The laying on of hands in the Bible is used for various purposes: to bless, to heal, or to delegate authority (Mark 16:18; Genesis 48:14-15; Numbers 27:18-20).

Revelation 2:21 warns that God gave them time to repent, but they persisted in their immorality.

Let us also recall that Bergoglio, in defending the sacrilegious blessing of homosexual concubines, stated that "they loved one another". This is not—as Prevost attempts to make us believe—merely a blessing of individuals (who, in fact, do not present themselves individually, but rather as homosexual couples); rather, it is a malicious act that confirms these concubines in their sinful homosexual relationship.

Saint Paul warns us not to be deceived, for those who obstinately practice the vice of sodomy, commit adultery, or are idolaters—worshiping Pachamama, the false god Allah, and other idols and false gods—will go to the eternal fire.

Homosexual concubines participate in a shared and eternal spiritual suicide. They are active participants in their mutual condemnation.

Jude 7: 7 Likewise, Sodom and Gomorrah and the surrounding cities, which, in the same manner as they, indulged in sexual immorality and pursued unnatural lust,[a] serve as an example by undergoing a punishment of eternal fire.

 

St. Thomas Aquinas: 'There, the associates of his wretchedness, far from alleviating the lot of the damned soul, will make it more intolerable for him.'

 

Hebrews 13:4 Let marriage be held in honor by all, and the marriage bed kept undefiled, for those who are immoral and adulterers will have to face God's judgment.

The primary objective of the Sacrament of Matrimony is to help one another attain Heaven—mutual salvation.

'The road to hell is open for the wicked. Once they enter into it, they will never come up again. They will be without glory or bliss and will be filled with misery and everlasting reproach.'
Christ, to St. Bridget of Sweden, 'The Revelations'

 

Scivias by Saint Hildegard von Bingen: 78. God will judge all perpetrators of fornication, sodomy and bestiality

 

“Someone who lived practicing the vice of sodomy will suffer more pains in Hell than any one else, because this is the worst sin that there is.” St. Bernardine of Siena

                                 "Do you renounce Satan? And all his works? And all his pomps?" R: "I do."

When we, as Catholics, renew our baptismal promises or vows, we swear before God and renounce all attchment to sin—all the works of Satan and his seductions; that is to say, we renounce living deliberately in sin. Therefore, it is impossible to receive a blessing when we deliberately defy God and, sinning out of presumption, expect Him to grant us impunity to continue sinning.

Hebrews 10:26 New Catholic Bible Apostasy Remains Unforgiven.[a] If we deliberately persist in sin after having received the knowledge of the truth, then there no longer remains any sacrifice for sins.

 

Footnotes Hebrews 10:26 Once again the author repeats this somber warning (see Heb 6:1-8; Mt 12:31). Those who rebel against Christ exclude themselves from Christ’s forgiveness, from his life, and from his grace. Let them, therefore, meditate on the threats of God’s vengeance about which the Bible speaks, and especially the texts cited here (see Ex 24:8; Deut 17:6; 32:35f; Isa 26:11).

 

2 Thessalonians 1:8-9

in flaming fire, inflicting vengeance on those who do not know God and on those who do not obey the gospel of our Lord Jesus.  These will suffer the punishment of eternal destruction, separated from the presence of the Lord and from the glory of his might

            

“The dog turns back to its own vomit,” and,

“The sow is washed only to wallow in the mud.

 

 

"What misery and what horror!" exclaims the prophet; "he who once fed on heavenly fare and was clad in purple found himself later covered in a mantle stained by sins, feeding on filthy refuse..." And Saint John Chrysostom—or rather, the author of the *Opus Imperfectum*—adds: "Laypeople are easily corrected, whereas priests, if they are wicked, are at the same time incorrigible." — Saint Alphonsus Maria de Liguori

 Satanist Lucien Greaves: Satan stands with abortionists and gay "marriage" supporters.

Only a Satanist could bestow a sacrilegious blessing upon sodomites who practice the sin of sodomy in defiance of God—who self-identify as sodomites and live together as sodomites—a sin that God has cursed and that God abhors.

Matthew 7:6 Give not that which is holy to dogs; neither cast ye your pearls before swine

Jesus warned that we must not cast the pearls before swine, lest they trample them underfoot—a reference to the Sacraments—for these are not the private property of priests.

PSEUDO-CHRYSOSTOM. (Catena Aurea) Otherwise; The Lord had commanded us to love our enemies, and to do good to those that sin against us. That from this Priests might not think themselves obliged to communicate also the things of God to such, He checked any such thought saying, Give not that which is holy to the dogs; as much as to say, I have bid you love your enemies, and do them good out of your temporal goods, but not out of My spiritual goods, without distinction. For they are your brethren by nature but not by faith, and God gives the good things of this life equally to the worthy and the unworthy, but not so spiritual graces.

 

AUGUSTINE. (ubi sup.) The dogs are those that assault the truth; the swine we may not unsuitably take for those that despise the truth. Therefore because dogs leap forth to rend in pieces, and what they rend, suffer not to continue whole, He said, Give not that which is holy to the dogs; because they strive to the utmost of their power to destroy the truth. The swine though they do not assault by biting as dogs, yet do they defile by trampling upon, and therefore He said, Cast not your pearls before swine.

 

RABANUS. Or; The dogs are returned to their vomit; the swine not yet returned, but wallowing in the mire of vices.

 

PSEUDO-CHRYSOSTOM (...) but by the swine are to be understood heretics, because they seem to call upon the name of the Lord. Give not therefore that which is holy to the dogs, for that baptism and the other sacraments are not to be given but to them that have the faith. In like manner the mysteries of the truth, that is, the pearls, are not to be given but to such as desire the truth and live with human reason. If then you cast them to the swine, that is, to such as are groveling in impurity of life, they do not understand their preciousness, but value them like to other worldly fables, and tread them under foot with their carnal life.

Francis Homosexual Blessing Contradicts the Will of God - Bishop Eleganti – Gloria.tv

The Church teaches that heretics cannot administer even sacramentals such as blessings.

The Church has declared that, in the proper use of a sacramental—for example, the wearing of a scapular—one commits oneself to wearing it with dignity; that is, to cease sinning, for such sacramentals are subject to abuse when one obstinately persists in sin, given that they are not amulets. No one would don the military uniform of a nation only to betray it and fight from within on behalf of the enemy side. If, on the social plane, this is called treason, it is no less so on the spiritual plane. Scripture clearly teaches us that anyone who continues to sin deliberately after baptism tramples upon the Blood of Christ. The person who deliberately commits sacrilege is renouncing the faith—is apostatizing from the faith; consequently, only eternal punishment awaits him, for—having spurned the Sacrifice of Christ by becoming a member of the enemy camp (thereby becoming a member of the body of the Antichrist)—he has committed a sin of blasphemy against the Holy Spirit and has rejected his own redemption. Likewise, no priest possesses a power superior to that of God that would allow him to "bless" a person who openly defies God, challenges Catholic moral doctrine, and lives deliberately in contradiction with the moral teachings of the Church. Such a priest thus becomes an ACCOMPLICE in sin and with sinners. He commits sacrilege. 

Canon 188§4 states: "All offices become vacant *ipso facto* by tacit resignation in the following cases... (4) If a cleric has publicly abandoned the Catholic faith."

Consequently, the priest becomes an apostate; together with the impenitent sinner, he commits the sin of blasphemy against the Holy Spirit. For if Scripture merely prohibits the laying on of hands upon impenitent sinners—because whoever does so participates in the sin—it follows that, by acting as an accomplice, one renders oneself deserving of exactly the same punishment as the one who commits the sin.                    

Prevost also maliciously added religious liberty to his heretical definition of "morality"—meaning that Prevost's morality stands in opposition to the Supremacy of Christ in society. He opposes the Reign of Christ; that is why we see this apostate fawning over idolatrous Muslims who worship the false god Allah. Nor does he have any qualms about worshipping Pachamama and supporting indigenous paganism.

Cardinal Müller: Francis, instead of returning “to the clarity of the word of God,” prefers “to bow before this absolutely wrong LGBT and woke ideology.”

 Bergoglio’s Seven Heresies in Amoris Laetitiae

Bergoglio's Homosexual Subversion Already Began in Buenos Aires