Gloria TV News:
On 26 August, Bishop Emeritus Raúl López of Saltillo, Mexico, celebrated a Eucharist at the Shrine of Guadalupe with a female concelebrant. Emilie Smith is a preacher of the Anglican Church of Canada. Dressed in a stole, she raised her arm during consecration while whispering words. She also recited a part of the Eucharistic Prayer and raised the chalice containing the consecrated Blood of Christ. The bishop himself shared the video of the sacrilege on Facebook. In 2019, Emilie Smith was invited by Pope Francis to an environmental conference in the Vatican.
Emilie Smith also gave the "homily"
Saint Cyprian of Carthage – Whoever is separated from the Church and is joined with an adulteress is separated from the promises of the Church.
Pope Leo XIII’s 1896 , Apostolicae Curae: Anglican orders are “absolutely null and utterly void”
OFFENCES AGAINST THE SACRAMENTS (Cann. 1379 - 1389)
Can. 1379— § 1. The following incur a latae sententiae interdict or, if a cleric, also a latae sententiae suspension:
1° a person who, not being an ordained priest, attempts the liturgical celebration of the Eucharistic Sacrifice
But unfortunately, we live in difficult times where sacrileges and crimes against the faith and the sacraments go unpunished because they cover up for each other, since they belong to the same group of heretics.
Marxist “bishop” head of the gay lobby, Raúl Vera, accompanied Bergoglio during his visit to Mexico.
Bergoglio venerating the Marxist priest Samuel Ruiz
April 26 2023
Defying Divine Natural Law and contradicting Catholic morality, José Raúl Vera López dedicated himself to corrupting the Diocese of Saltillo by engaging in gay activism and supporting the dissident homosexual activist group ‘San Elredo’
Gay activist Robert Coogan |
Apostate gay activist Raúl López of Saltillo, Mexico, is not in communion with the Catholic Church, nor was apostate Bergoglio.
Anglicans' Sodoma Supplians celebration: The Background of the desecration of San Bartolomeo 's Church in Rome
Pope Leo XIII
It breaks away from the Apostolic succession
In the rite of conferring and administering any sacrament one rightly distinguishes between the ceremonial part and the essential part, which is customarily called the matter and form. […] Now, the words which until recent times were everywhere held by the Anglicans as the proper form of priestly ordination, namely, ‘Receive the Holy Spirit,’ certainly do not in the least signify definitely the order of priesthood, or its grace and power, which is especially the power ‘of consecrating and of offering the true Body and Blood of the Lord,’ in that sacrifice which is no ‘nude commemoration of the sacrifice offered on the Cross’ [see n. 950]. Such a form was indeed afterwards lengthened by these words, ‘for the office and work of a priest’; but this rather convinces one that the Anglicans themselves saw that this first form was defective, and not appropriate to the matter. But the same addition, if perchance indeed it could have placed legitimate significance on the form, was introduced too late, since a century had elapsed after the adoption of the Edwardine Ordinal; since, moreover, with the extinction of the hierarchy, there was now no power for ordaining. (Denzinger-Hünermann 3315-3316. Leo XIII, Letter Apostolicae curae – On the Nullity of Anglican Orders, September 13, 1896)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.