The Church does not universally and peacefully adhere to Francis as pope
The thesis of “universal acceptance” is unsustainable not only for the reasons that McCusker exhaustively explains, but also for the evidence that this presumed acceptance of the Pope concerns an ecclesial body that sixty years of Vatican II and doctrinal deviations have accustomed to heresy, religious illiteracy, and open rebellion; and this is also thanks to the "democratization" of the Church - the “collegial church” of Vatican II, which later evolved into a “synodal church” with Bergoglio - which has accustomed the faithful to permanent revolution, "castrating" them in their ability to react and oppose false shepherds.
I wonder if Bishop Schneider, Dr. Kwasniewski, various bloggers in the conservative world, Recognize & Resist and other supporters of Bergoglio's legitimacy - to whom they however claim the right to disobey whatever they do not agree with about his "magisterium" - should not study the topic proposed by Dr. McCusker, if only to dispel the doubt of their possible role as gatekeepers.
This cooperation of theirs - whether voluntary or unconscious - in recognizing legitimacy to Bergoglio has only one final beneficiary: Bergoglio himself - he who only cares about the affirmation of his own power in order to continue to demolish the Church and also have fake opponents, whom he also insults and humiliates.
The bull “Cum ex apostolatus” that ANNULS the elevation of a heretic to the papacy belongs to the Infallible Magisterium of the Church and was confirmed by Pope Saint Pius V and by the Code of Canon Law of 1917
“It is very clear that the election [as Pope] of a heretic, schismatic or woman would be null and void.”
Revelation 13:8 All the inhabitants of the earth will worship it, all those whose names have not been written from the creation of the world in the book of life belonging to the Lamb who was slain.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.