— Council of Vienne ♰♰♰

Saturday, March 2, 2024

The apostate homosexualist and heretic Bergoglio was not canonically elected but fraudulently imposed by the St. Gallen mafia


John 10:1 Amen, amen I say to you: He that entereth not by the door into the sheepfold, but climbeth up another way, the same is a thief and a robber.


John 10:5  However, they will never follow a stranger. Rather, they will run away from him, because they do not recognize the voice of strangers.” 


Daniel 11:21 Douay-Rheims 1899 American Edition And there shall stand up in his place one despised, and the kingly honour shall not be given him: and he shall come privately, and shall obtain the kingdom by fraud.


In the presentation of his authorized biography, the archbishop emeritus of Brussels, Cardinal Godfried Dannels, acknowledges that he and other cardinals, united by the desire to "modernize" the Church, formed a "mafia" to prevent the election of Benedict XVI and oppose to him once elected. Godfried Danneels admitted, in his biography authorized in September 2015, to have belonged to a group called Mafia since 1999 to conspire in the election of the successor of Pope John Paul II and later in the election of Pope Francis.

The biography also reveals that Danneels wrote in May 2003 a letter to Belgian Prime Minister Guy Verhofstad congratulating him for having introduced marriage for homosexuals in the country and thus ending discrimination against same sex 'couples'.

Monsignor Livi: Francis' election was orchestrated by the St. Gallen Mafia

VIDEO: Dr. Mazza destroys the idea that Bergoglio could be pope

Mark Docherty: Ed Mazza: Francis is a Carbon Copy of Martini!

 “Antipope” is not a title, it is a criminal act. The charge is that Bergoglio is an impostor, this entire past 11 years nothing but a deception, his entire “magisterium” fraudulent.

Bergoglio must be judged with the highest canonical penalty for usurpation of an ecclesiastical office.


Bergoglio's false papacy is a human invention of an anti-Catholic mafia enemy of God and the Church.

John Chrysostom (Bible Catena Aurea)
AD 407
Observe the marks of a robber; first, that he does not enter openly; secondly, not according to the Scriptures, for this is the, not by the door. Here also He referrs to those who had been before, and to those who should be after Him, Antichrist and the false Christs, Judas and Theudas, and whatever others there have been of the same kind. And with good cause He calls the Scriptures a door, for they bring us to God, and open to us the knowledge of God, they make the sheep, they guard them, and suffer not the wolves to come in after them. For Scripture, like some sure door, bars the passage against the heretics, placing us in a state of safety as to all that we desire, and not allowing us to wander; and if we undo it not, we shall not easily be conquered by our foes. By it we can know all, both those who are, and those who are not, shepherds. But what is into the fold? It refers to the sheep, and the care of them. For he that uses not the Scriptures, but climbs up some other way, that is, who cuts out for himself another and an unusual way, the same is a thief. Do you see from this too that Christ agrees with the Father, in that He brings forward the Scriptures? On which account also He said to the Jews, Search the Scriptures John 5:39; and brought forward Moses, and called him and all the Prophets witnesses, for all, says He, who hear the Prophets shall come to Me; and, Had ye believed Moses, you would have believed Me. But here He has put the same thing metaphorically. And by saying, climbs up some other way, He alluded to the Scribes, because they taught for commandments the doctrines of men, and transgressed the Law Matthew 15:9; with which He reproached them, and said, None of you does the Law. John 7:19 Well did He say, climbs up, not enters in, since to climb is the act of a thief intending to overleap a wall, and who does all with danger. Have you seen how He has sketched the robber? Now observe the character of the shepherd. What then is it?

Bergoglio's papacy is man-made
Adulteration of Matthew 16:18

Francis: The election prepared for years The election of Jorge Bergoglio was the result of secret meetings that cardinals and bishops, organized by Carlo Maria Martini, held for years in St. Gallen, Switzerland. This is according to Jürgen Mettepenningen and Karim Schelkens, authors of a recently published biography of Belgian Cardinal Godfried Danneels. Who calls the group of cardinals and bishops a "mafia club."

 The German Option of the Argentine Pope

 Cardinal Kasper and the progressive wing of the Church of Germany have gotten what they wanted. On communion for the divorced and remarried, Francis is on their side. He made up his mind a while ago, and has acted accordingly.

The Belgian newspaper Le Vif points out: “On March 13, 2013, there was an old acquaintance in the side of the new Pope Francis: Godfried Danneels. Officially, he was there as dean of the cardinal priests, but in reality he had discreetly maneuvered for years to influence the Papal election”.


The 'Great Reformer' Book demonstrates Bergoglio's illegitimacy

 ‘The Great Reformer. Francis and the Making of a Radical Pope’.

Team Bergoglio” is the plot against the Church by a group of Cardinals who launched a lobbying campaign before the conclave to elect Bergoglio.
In the first edition of his book, Ivereigh writes that “they first secured Bergoglio's assent”. 

“They first secured his assent. Asked if he was willing, he said that he believed that at this time of crisis for the Church no cardinal could refuse if asked.”
“Then they got to work touring the cardinals’ dinners to promote their man…”

Gloria.TV News on the 25th of November 2014

Team Bergoglio: Austen Ivereigh writes in a not yet published biography of the Pope that there was a highly organised campaign by a small group of European cardinals to elect Cardinal Bergoglio pope. He calls the group "Team Bergoglio". Its key members were the liberal Cardinal Cormac Murphy-O'Connor, then 80 and without a vote in the conclave, and cardinal Walter Kasper. Ivereigh is a former press secretary of Murphy-O'Connor.

How It Happened: According to Ivereigh the “Team Bergoglio” learnt from the Conclave of 2005. They first secured Bergoglio's assent. He answered that at this time of crisis for the Church no cardinal could refuse if asked. Murphy-O'Connor warned him to 'be careful'. Begoglio replied: “I understand”. The “Team Bergoglio” started touring the cardinals' dinners to promote their man. They argued that his age should not be considered an obstacle because popes could resign.

Lobbying the Cardinals: Cardinal Murphy-O'Connor's role included lobbying the cardinals from North American and from Commonwealth countries. Having understood from the 2005 conclave, the Team Bergoglio knew that votes travelled to those who made a strong showing out of the gate. A key turning point came during the meetings of the Cardinals before the conclave when Bergoglio gave a short but moving speech about the state of the Church.

Black and White: In the 2005 conclave Cardinal Bergoglio was the runner-up having been put forward by an alliance of mainly European leftwing Cardinals. But it election was prevented by what Ivereigh calls “a dirty tricks campaign by opponents from Argentina”. This remark can only refer to Cardinal Leonardo Sandri, the Prefect of the Congregation for the Oriental Churches.

“The Great Reformer”: Francis and the Making of a Radical Pope.

Sandro Magister: One last note about the alliance between the Argentine pope and the progressive wing of the German hierarchy: Cardinal Kasper, together with his countryman and comrade Karl Lehmann, had an important part in that handful of cardinals which in the decades before and after 2000 met periodically in Sankt Gallen, in German-speaking Switzerland, and from which finally emerged the election of Bergoglio as pope.

Universi Dominici Gregis 81
The Cardinal electors shall further abstain from any form of pact, agreement, promise or other commitment of any kind which could oblige them to give or deny their vote to a person or persons. If this were in fact done, even under oath, I decree that such a commitment shall be null and void and that no one shall be bound to observe it; and I hereby impose the penalty of excommunication latae sententiae upon those who violate this prohibition. It is not my intention however to forbid, during the period in which the See is vacant, the exchange of views concerning the election.

“If it’s a short conclave, Bergoglio will be elected pope. You can be sure of that.” Those words were whispered by the British cardinal Cormac Murphy O’Connor just before the start of the 2013 conclave. He was talking to Austin Ivereigh, his spokesman at that time. 

Shortly after his fraudulent election Bergoglio was overheard telling Murphy-O'Connor: 'Tuo e colpevole', translated as 'You're to blame.'


The Argentine newspaper Clarín also spoke of the lobbying that Timothy Dolan did in favor of Bergoglio: «In reality, it was later learned that there was a very consistent lobby created by Timothy Dolan, the archbishop of New York, to consummate the vote in favor of Francis. Clarín 03/14/13
Universi Dominici Gregis 82. I likewise forbid the Cardinals before the election to enter into any stipulations, committing themselves of common accord to a certain course of action should one of them be elevated to the Pontificate. These promises too, should any in fact be made, even under oath, I also declare null and void.
 Interview With 'Il Messaggero'
--Q: Where is Bergoglio’s Church heading?
-Bergoglio alias Pope Francis:« In regard to the plan, instead, I follow what the Cardinals have requested during the General Congregations before the Conclave. I go in that direction. The Council of Eight Cardinals, an external body, was born from that. It was requested to help reform the Curia. Something, moreover, that isn’t easy because a step is taken, but then it emerges that this or that must be done, and if before there was one dicastery, it then becomes four. My decisions are the fruit of the pre Conclave meetings. I haven’t done anything on my own. “Il Messaggero” – June 9, 2014).


Vatican City, May 29, 2019 

Pope Francis said that it is not his reform, but something  “the cardinals have requested.” 

“ The scheme of the court is what has to disappear. And this was requested by all the cardinals, well, most, thanks be to God,”  Pope Francis said.

Denzingerbergoglio: What would we think then, if someone were to accuse the light of a kind of spiritual conceited narcissism in fulfilling exactly that which is proper to its condition of being light?

Bergoglio "I stayed to live in Casa Santa Marta, which is a guest house (where we stayed during the Conclave) for bishops, priests and lay people.

  The director of the luxurious Casa Santa Marta the controversial (homosexual) (Apostata) Monsignor Battista Ricca.

Walter Kasper

Cormac Murphy-O’Connor

Oscar Rodriguez Maradiaga

Francisco Errazuriz Ossa
and, lest we forget,

Jorge Mario Bergoglio.
Oh, and one other:

Theodore McCarrick.

When Ratzinger was elected pope in 2005, the “mafia” did not disband, but decided to oppose him and prepare the succession of the German pontiff, plot prohibited by Canon Law. Godfried Danneels himself confessed it.

Danneels presented an authorized biography of him in Brussels and recognized, as explained in the book, the existence of a group of Central European cardinals who since 1996 conspired to control the succession of John Paul II, and prevent Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger from accessing Peter's chair.

Universi Dominici Gregis
79. Confirming the prescriptions of my Predecessors, I likewise forbid anyone, even if he is a Cardinal, during the Pope's lifetime and without having consulted him, to make plans concerning the election of his successor, or to promise votes, or to make decisions in this regard in private gatherings.

Monsignior Gracida explains that the “universal acceptance” argument is nullified by Pope John Paul II's Universi Dominici Gregis. Because universal acceptance was an ancient practice that was used when pontiffs were not canonically elected but by popular acclamation.

A "Peter Emeritus" is incompatible with the promises of Jesus Christ and contradicts Scripture.
Bergoglio's false papacy is a human invention.

Pope Innocent X specifically condemned the “Error of the Dual Head of the Church.”

Benedict XVI: “declaro me ministerio Episcopi Romae ... commisso renuntiare” 

Vittorio Messori: “That is to say, we discover, that Benedict XVI did not intend to renounce the munus petrinus, nor the office, or the duties, i.e. which Christ Himself attributed to the Head of the Apostles and which has been passed on to his successors. The Pope intended to renounce only the ministerium, which is the exercise and concrete administration of that office.

Socci: Benedict XVI “did not intend to renounce the pontifical munus” which “is irrevocable”

Archbishop Gänswein, said Benedict did not abandon the papacy like Pope Celestine V in the 13th century but rather sought to continue his Petrine Office in a more appropriate way given his frailty.
“Therefore, from 11 February 2013, the papal ministry is not the same as before,” he said. “It is and remains the foundation of the Catholic Church; and yet it is a foundation that Benedict XVI has profoundly and lastingly transformed by his exceptional pontificate.” 
“He left the Papal Throne and yet, with the step he took on 11 February 2013, he has not abandoned this ministry,” Gänswein explained, something "quite impossible after his irrevocable acceptance of the office in April 2005.” 

Since the election of his successor Francis, on March 13, 2013, there are not therefore two popes, but de facto an expanded ministry — with an active member and a contemplative member. This is why Benedict XVI has not given up either his name, or the white cassock. This is why the correct name by which to address him even today is ‘Your Holiness’.

“Therefore he has also not retired to a monastery in isolation but stays within the Vatican — as if he had taken only one step to the side to make room for his successor and a new stage in the history of the papacy.” With that step, he said, he has enriched the papacy with “his prayer and his compassion placed in the Vatican Gardens.” 

Father Paul Kramer:
As the eminent canonist Stefano Violi says, Benedict XVI did not resign the papal office, but only its administration. Since the Petrine office is indivisible (as Domenico Gravina OP explained ca. 1610), a partial act of renunciation is null and void due to defect of intention, and therefore does not suffice to vacate the Chair of Peter. 
Thomas Aquinas' Catena Aurea : Gloss., ap. Anselm: This power was committed specially to Peter, that we might thereby be invited to unity. For He therefore appointed him the head of the Apostles, that the Church might have one principal Vicar of Christ, to whom the different members of the Church should have recourse, if ever they should have dissensions among them. But if there were many heads in the Church, the bond of unity would be broken.

Bergoglio's interview with Mexican Valentina Alazraki, Televisa correspondent:

2015-03-13 Valentina Alazraki: You also told us that will follow the example of Pope Benedict ... This changes a bit 'the idea of the papacy, because we used that the pope was an institution created by the Holy Spirit and to the death.
Bergoglio:- “There were some cardinals who prior to the conclave, in the general congregations, probed the very interesting, very rich theological problem. I think that what Pope Benedict did has been to open a door. 60 years ago there were no emeritus bishops. And now we have 1400. They came to the idea that a man after 75, or close to that age, cannot carry the weight of a particular church. In general I think what Benedict so courageously did was to open the door to the Popes emeritus. Benedict should not be considered an exception, but an institution. Maybe he will be the only one for a long time, maybe he will not be the only one. But an institutional door has been opened. Today the Pope Emeritus is no longer a rarity since a door for him to exist as a figure has been opened”. 
Can you imagine a situation where a Pope retires at 80 as is the case with bishops?
Bergoglio- “I can. However, I do not really like the idea of an age limit. Because I believe that the Papacy is a kind of last instance. It is a special grace. For some theologians the Papacy is a sacrament. The Germans are very creative in all these things. I do not think so, but I want to say that it is something special. To say that one is in charge up to 80 years, creates a sensation that the pontificate is at it’s end and that would not be a good thing. Predictability. I would not support the idea of putting an age limit on it, but I share the idea of what Benedict did. 

Bergoglio: “Benedict resigned with courage and prayer, and with Science and Theology. He opened this door. But there is only one Pope, the other one is a Pope Emeritus. Perhaps in the future there will be two or three, but they are Emeritus.” 2016-06-27
Faced with this falsehood without biblical basis, Bergoglio later contradicted himself.

Bergoglio: “A shepherd must be ready to step down completely from his church, rather than leave in a partial manner” May 30,2017

The Jesuit heretic Jon Sobrino wrote:
  "The resignation of Benedict XVI is an important fact. It can move the life of the Church in one direction or another. And because of what it has as an “unprecedented rupture” -

Jon Sobrino said: “Hopefully we can humanize and demystify the pope. The task is not easy at all.”- Jon Sobrino stated that Bergoglio's first gestures were significant: “kneeling before the people”


The Wanderer: 
«Bergoglio is a Peronist ruler or, what is the same, a populist. His former seminary classmate and former Third World priest, Domingo Bresci, unraveled it very well in this interview. He cares about what the people say or think and not the elite of theologians and, much less, that of the semi-Pelagian restorationists among whom we count ourselves. We already know what General Perón thought of the Argentine “cow oligarchy”; Jorge Mario thinks the same about the theological oligarchy. Furthermore, let us not forget that, as the pontiff himself has said, his theological mentor was Lucio Gera and his “theology of the people”, according to which “the people” are not subject to evangelize but rather subject to evangelize. It is understood in this way, beyond the undeniable populist desire, that Bergoglio's first gesture when appearing at the Vatican loggia on the fateful 3/13/13, was to ask for the blessing of the people. And that also explains why he ordered a survey of the people to find out his opinion on the family and other questions of sexual morality. "The people teach"



A false papacy invented by the homosexual anti-Catholic mafia of St. Gallen; invented by the enemies of God and the Church.

«According to Leonrado Boff, Bergoglio is the pope of rupture, 'the word that Benedict XVI and John Paul II feared most, known for their conservatism'. “They believed that the Church should have continuity, so the Second Vatican Council could not mean a break with the first. But now there is a break, the figure of the Pope is no longer the classic one, it is another. Francis did not begin with the reform of the curia, 
began with the reform of the papacy


“The goal [of Freemasonry] is no longer the destruction of the Church, but to make use of it by infiltrating it.” (Words of a Freemason (J.M. Jourdan) quoted in Athanasius and the Church of Our Time by Bishop Rudolph Graber)

Kasper a "very sharp theology" according Bergoglio equates homosexual fornication with Christian marriage

Apostate Cardinal Kasper assures that homosexual unions will be a central issue in the next Synod

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.